--- title: "Waaree BiN-08-585 vs Waaree BiN-08-595 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Waaree BiN-08-585 vs Waaree BiN-08-595 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bin-08-585/waaree-bin-08-595" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Waaree BiN-08-585 vs Waaree BiN-08-595 595 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.38 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Waaree BiN-08-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bin-08-585) | [Waaree BiN-08-595](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bin-08-595) | | Manufacturer | Waaree | Waaree | | Power | 585 Wp | 595 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.65 % | 23.03 % | | Technology | N-type | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 585 | 595 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.65 % | 23.03 % | +0.38 pp for 595 | | Power density | 226.5 Wp/m² | 230.3 Wp/m² | +3.9 Wp/m² for 595 | | Rated power | 585 Wp | 595 Wp | +10 W for 595 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 585 | 595 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 585 Wp | 595 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.65 % | 23.03 % | | Power density | 226.5 Wp/m² | 230.3 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 52.70 V | 53.10 V | | Voltage at max power | 44.15 V | 44.44 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.99 A | 14.11 A | | Current at max power | 13.25 A | 13.39 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2278x1134x33 mm | 2278x1134x33 mm | | Module area | 2.583 m² | 2.583 m² | | Weight | 32.5 kg | 32.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 55.6 kg/kWp | 54.6 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 144 | 144 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 585:** 19,628 kWh - **Cumulative output, 595:** 19,963 kWh - **Gap:** 335 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 585 | 595 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 585 W | 595 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 559 W | 568 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 532 W | 541 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 506 W | 515 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 585 | 595 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,522 | #1,744 | 14,005 | 595 leads by 1,778 places | | Power density | #3,500 | #1,758 | 14,005 | 595 leads by 1,742 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #9,909 | #8,977 | 14,005 | 595 leads by 932 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #4,144 | #3,351 | 14,005 | 595 leads by 793 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Waaree BiN-08-585 or Waaree BiN-08-595? According to our database: **Waaree BiN-08-595** has higher module efficiency (**23.03%** vs **22.65%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Waaree BiN-08-585 and Waaree BiN-08-595? **Waaree BiN-08-585** has a module efficiency of **22.65%**, while **Waaree BiN-08-595** is **23.03%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Waaree BiN-08-585 use vs Waaree BiN-08-595? **Waaree BiN-08-585** uses **N-type** cells; **Waaree BiN-08-595** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Waaree BiN-08-585 and Waaree BiN-08-595? **Waaree BiN-08-585** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Waaree BiN-08-595** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Waaree BiN-08-585 and Waaree BiN-08-595 bifacial panels? Both **Waaree BiN-08-585** and **Waaree BiN-08-595** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Waaree BiN-08-585 vs Waaree BiN-08-600](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bin-08-585/waaree-bin-08-600) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree BiN-08-585 vs Waaree BiN-08-590](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bin-08-585/waaree-bin-08-590) - The same specification on paper - [Waaree BiN-08-585 vs Waaree BiN-08-580](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bin-08-585/waaree-bin-08-580) - One difference: module efficiency - [Waaree BiN-08-585 vs Waaree BiN-08-575](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bin-08-585/waaree-bin-08-575) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree BiN-08-585 vs Waaree BiN-08-570](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bin-08-585/waaree-bin-08-570) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree BiN-08-585 vs Waaree BiN-08-565](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bin-08-585/waaree-bin-08-565) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bin-08-585/waaree-bin-08-595 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.