--- title: "Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiN-08-555 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiN-08-555 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-725/waaree-bin-08-555" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiN-08-555 BiH-11-725 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.86 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Waaree BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-725) | [Waaree BiN-08-555](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bin-08-555) | | Manufacturer | Waaree | Waaree | | Power | 725 Wp | 555 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.34 % | 21.48 % | | Technology | HJT | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | BiH-11-725 | BiN-08-555 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 23.34 % | 21.48 % | +1.86 pp for BiH-11-725 | | Temperature coefficient | -0.240 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | +0.060 %/°C for BiH-11-725 | | Rated power | 725 Wp | 555 Wp | +170 W for BiH-11-725 | | Power density | 233.4 Wp/m² | 214.8 Wp/m² | +18.6 Wp/m² for BiH-11-725 | | Weight | 39.0 kg | 32.0 kg | -7.0 kg for BiN-08-555 | | Annual degradation | 0.30 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | -0.10 %/yr for BiH-11-725 | | Short-circuit current | 18.15 A | 14.05 A | 4.10 A apart | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.584 m² | 0.522 m² apart | | Weight per kWp | 53.8 kg/kWp | 57.7 kg/kWp | -3.9 kg/kWp for BiH-11-725 | | Cell technology | HJT | TOPCon | HJT vs TOPCon | | Current at max power | 17.10 A | 13.28 A | 3.82 A apart | | Cell count | 132 | 144 | 12 cells apart | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2279x1134x35 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | BiH-11-725 | BiN-08-555 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 725 Wp | 555 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.34 % | 21.48 % | | Power density | 233.4 Wp/m² | 214.8 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 50.49 V | 50.50 V | | Voltage at max power | 42.40 V | 41.80 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.15 A | 14.05 A | | Current at max power | 17.10 A | 13.28 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.240 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2279x1134x35 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.584 m² | | Weight | 39.0 kg | 32.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.8 kg/kWp | 57.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.30 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | HJT | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 144 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, BiH-11-725:** 24,704 kWh - **Cumulative output, BiN-08-555:** 18,621 kWh - **Gap:** 6,083 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | BiH-11-725 | BiN-08-555 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 725 W | 555 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 699 W | 530 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 673 W | 505 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 647 W | 480 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | BiH-11-725 | BiN-08-555 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #943 | #8,152 | 14,005 | BiH-11-725 leads by 7,209 places | | Power density | #936 | #8,148 | 14,005 | BiH-11-725 leads by 7,212 places | | Heat behaviour | #13 | #6,093 | 14,005 | BiH-11-725 leads by 6,080 places | | Weight | #7,866 | #11,340 | 14,005 | BiH-11-725 leads by 3,474 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #412 | #6,600 | 14,005 | BiH-11-725 leads by 6,188 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Waaree BiH-11-725 or Waaree BiN-08-555? According to our database: **Waaree BiH-11-725** has higher module efficiency (**23.34%** vs **21.48%**); **Waaree BiH-11-725** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.240%/°C** vs **-0.300%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree BiN-08-555? **Waaree BiH-11-725** has a module efficiency of **23.34%**, while **Waaree BiN-08-555** is **21.48%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Waaree BiH-11-725 use vs Waaree BiN-08-555? **Waaree BiH-11-725** uses **HJT** cells; **Waaree BiN-08-555** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree BiN-08-555? **Waaree BiH-11-725** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Waaree BiN-08-555** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree BiN-08-555 bifacial panels? Both **Waaree BiH-11-725** and **Waaree BiN-08-555** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-725/waaree-bih-11-730) - The same specification on paper - [Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-725/waaree-bih-11-720) - The same specification on paper - [Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-725/waaree-bih-11-715) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-725/waaree-bih-11-710) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-725/waaree-bih-11-705) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-725/waaree-bih-11-700) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-725/waaree-bin-08-555 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.