---
title: "Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-720 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-720 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-705/waaree-bih-11-720"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-720

720 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Waaree BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-705) | [Waaree BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-720) |
| Manufacturer | Waaree | Waaree |
| Power | 705 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.70 % | 23.18 % |
| Technology | HJT | HJT |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 705 | 720 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.70 % | 23.18 % | +0.48 pp for 720 |
| Power density | 227.0 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² | +4.8 Wp/m² for 720 |
| Rated power | 705 Wp | 720 Wp | +15 W for 720 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 705 | 720 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 705 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.70 % | 23.18 % |
| Power density | 227.0 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 49.96 V | 50.36 V |
| Voltage at max power | 41.91 V | 42.28 V |
| Short-circuit current | 17.87 A | 18.08 A |
| Current at max power | 16.82 A | 17.03 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.240 %/°C | -0.240 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 39.0 kg | 39.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 55.3 kg/kWp | 54.2 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.30 %/yr | 0.30 %/yr |
| Cell technology | HJT | HJT |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 705:** 24,022 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 720:** 24,533 kWh
- **Gap:** 511 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 705 | 720 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 705 W | 720 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 680 W | 694 W | 96.4% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 654 W | 668 W | 92.8% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 629 W | 642 W | 89.2% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 705 | 720 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #3,307 | #1,424 | 14,005 | 720 leads by 1,883 places |
| Power density | #3,361 | #1,347 | 14,005 | 720 leads by 2,014 places |
| Heat behaviour | #13 | #13 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #9,775 | #8,370 | 14,005 | 720 leads by 1,405 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #1,037 | #557 | 14,005 | 720 leads by 480 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Waaree BiH-11-705 or Waaree BiH-11-720?

According to our database: **Waaree BiH-11-720** has higher module efficiency (**23.18%** vs **22.70%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Waaree BiH-11-705 and Waaree BiH-11-720?

**Waaree BiH-11-705** has a module efficiency of **22.70%**, while **Waaree BiH-11-720** is **23.18%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Waaree BiH-11-705 use vs Waaree BiH-11-720?

**Waaree BiH-11-705** uses **HJT** cells; **Waaree BiH-11-720** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Waaree BiH-11-705 and Waaree BiH-11-720?

**Waaree BiH-11-705** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Waaree BiH-11-720** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Waaree BiH-11-705 and Waaree BiH-11-720 bifacial panels?

Both **Waaree BiH-11-705** and **Waaree BiH-11-720** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-705/waaree-bih-11-730) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-705/waaree-bih-11-725) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-705/waaree-bih-11-715) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-705/waaree-bih-11-710) - The same specification on paper
- [Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-705/waaree-bih-11-700) - The same specification on paper
- [Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-705/waaree-bi-68-665) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bih-11-705/waaree-bih-11-720

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

