---
title: "Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-650 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-650 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bi-66-585/waaree-bi-68-650"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-650

68-650 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 65 W more power. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Waaree Bi-66-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-66-585) | [Waaree Bi-68-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-68-650) |
| Manufacturer | Waaree | Waaree |
| Power | 585 Wp | 650 Wp |
| Efficiency | 20.52 % | 20.82 % |
| Technology | PERC | PERC |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 66-585 | 68-650 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 585 Wp | 650 Wp | +65 W for 68-650 |
| Weight | 35.5 kg | 39.0 kg | -3.5 kg for 66-585 |
| Open-circuit voltage | 41.76 V | 46.09 V | 4.33 V apart |
| Module area | 2.851 m² | 3.125 m² | 0.273 m² apart |
| Module efficiency | 20.52 % | 20.82 % | +0.30 pp for 68-650 |
| Cell count | 120 | 132 | 12 cells apart |
| Voltage at max power | 34.34 V | 37.91 V | 3.57 V apart |
| Dimensions | 2190x1302x35 mm | 2400x1302x35 mm | 2190x1302x35 mm vs 2400x1302x35 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 66-585 | 68-650 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 585 Wp | 650 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 20.52 % | 20.82 % |
| Power density | 205.2 Wp/m² | 208.0 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 41.76 V | 46.09 V |
| Voltage at max power | 34.34 V | 37.91 V |
| Short-circuit current | 17.78 A | 17.84 A |
| Current at max power | 17.04 A | 17.16 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.340 %/°C | -0.340 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2190x1302x35 mm | 2400x1302x35 mm |
| Module area | 2.851 m² | 3.125 m² |
| Weight | 35.5 kg | 39.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 60.7 kg/kWp | 60.0 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.55 %/yr | 0.55 %/yr |
| Cell technology | PERC | PERC |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 120 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 66-585:** 18,959 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 68-650:** 21,066 kWh
- **Gap:** 2,107 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 66-585 | 68-650 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 585 W | 650 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 555 W | 617 W | 94.9% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 525 W | 584 W | 89.8% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 495 W | 551 W | 84.7% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 66-585 | 68-650 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #11,244 | #10,443 | 14,005 | 68-650 leads by 801 places |
| Power density | #11,293 | #10,477 | 14,005 | 68-650 leads by 816 places |
| Heat behaviour | #8,778 | #8,778 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #12,517 | #12,326 | 14,005 | 68-650 leads by 191 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #6,692 | #4,037 | 14,005 | 68-650 leads by 2,655 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Waaree Bi-66-585 or Waaree Bi-68-650?

According to our database: **Waaree Bi-68-650** has higher module efficiency (**20.82%** vs **20.52%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Waaree Bi-66-585 and Waaree Bi-68-650?

**Waaree Bi-66-585** has a module efficiency of **20.52%**, while **Waaree Bi-68-650** is **20.82%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Waaree Bi-66-585 use vs Waaree Bi-68-650?

**Waaree Bi-66-585** uses **PERC** cells; **Waaree Bi-68-650** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Waaree Bi-66-585 and Waaree Bi-68-650?

**Waaree Bi-66-585** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Waaree Bi-68-650** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Waaree Bi-66-585 and Waaree Bi-68-650 bifacial panels?

Both **Waaree Bi-66-585** and **Waaree Bi-68-650** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bi-66-585/waaree-bi-68-665) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-660](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bi-66-585/waaree-bi-68-660) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-655](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bi-66-585/waaree-bi-68-655) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-645](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bi-66-585/waaree-bi-68-645) - 7 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-66-600](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bi-66-585/waaree-bi-66-600) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-66-595](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bi-66-585/waaree-bi-66-595) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-bi-66-585/waaree-bi-68-650

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

