---
title: "Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05

735.05 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) |
| Manufacturer | Vikram Solar | Vikram Solar |
| Power | 720 Wp | 735 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.18 % | 23.66 % |
| Technology | HJT | HJT |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 720.05 | 735.05 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 23.18 % | 23.66 % | +0.48 pp for 735.05 |
| Power density | 231.8 Wp/m² | 236.6 Wp/m² | +4.8 Wp/m² for 735.05 |
| Rated power | 720 Wp | 735 Wp | +15 W for 735.05 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 720.05 | 735.05 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 720 Wp | 735 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.18 % | 23.66 % |
| Power density | 231.8 Wp/m² | 236.6 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 51.10 V | 51.60 V |
| Voltage at max power | 42.72 V | 43.20 V |
| Short-circuit current | 17.64 A | 17.82 A |
| Current at max power | 16.86 A | 17.04 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 39.5 kg | 39.5 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 54.9 kg/kWp | 53.7 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.38 %/yr | 0.38 %/yr |
| Cell technology | HJT | HJT |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 720.05:** 24,233 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 735.05:** 24,737 kWh
- **Gap:** 504 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 720.05 | 735.05 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 720 W | 735 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 692 W | 706 W | 96.1% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 664 W | 678 W | 92.2% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 636 W | 649 W | 88.3% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 720.05 | 735.05 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,424 | #602 | 14,005 | 735.05 leads by 822 places |
| Power density | #1,347 | #582 | 14,005 | 735.05 leads by 765 places |
| Heat behaviour | #511 | #511 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #9,249 | #7,773 | 14,005 | 735.05 leads by 1,476 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #564 | #246 | 14,005 | 735.05 leads by 318 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 or Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05?

According to our database: **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05** has higher module efficiency (**23.66%** vs **23.18%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05?

**Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05** has a module efficiency of **23.18%**, while **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05** is **23.66%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 use vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05?

**Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05** uses **HJT** cells; **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05?

**Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 bifacial panels?

Both **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05** and **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) - The same specification on paper
- [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) - The same specification on paper
- [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) - 6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
- [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) - 7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

