---
title: "Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-670"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-670.png"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670

680.05 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.32 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05) | [Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-670) |
| Manufacturer | Vikram Solar | Vikram Solar |
| Power | 680 Wp | 670 Wp |
| Efficiency | 21.89 % | 21.57 % |
| Technology | PERC | PERC |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 680.05 | AAA.05-670 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 21.89 % | 21.57 % | +0.32 pp for 680.05 |
| Power density | 218.9 Wp/m² | 215.7 Wp/m² | +3.2 Wp/m² for 680.05 |
| Rated power | 680 Wp | 670 Wp | +10 W for 680.05 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 680.05 | AAA.05-670 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 680 Wp | 670 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 21.89 % | 21.57 % |
| Power density | 218.9 Wp/m² | 215.7 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 46.90 V | 46.50 V |
| Voltage at max power | 39.30 V | 38.90 V |
| Short-circuit current | 18.23 A | 18.11 A |
| Current at max power | 17.31 A | 17.22 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.350 %/°C | -0.350 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 39.5 kg | 39.5 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 58.1 kg/kWp | 59.0 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.50 %/yr | 0.50 %/yr |
| Cell technology | PERC | PERC |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 680.05:** 22,216 kWh
- **Cumulative output, AAA.05-670:** 21,889 kWh
- **Gap:** 327 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 680.05 | AAA.05-670 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 680 W | 670 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 644 W | 635 W | 94.8% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 609 W | 600 W | 89.5% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 573 W | 564 W | 84.2% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 680.05 | AAA.05-670 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #6,946 | #7,798 | 14,129 | 680.05 leads by 852 places |
| Power density | #6,868 | #7,708 | 14,129 | 680.05 leads by 840 places |
| Heat behaviour | #10,489 | #10,489 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #11,647 | #12,051 | 14,129 | 680.05 leads by 404 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #1,971 | #2,542 | 14,129 | 680.05 leads by 571 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 or Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670?

According to our database: **Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05** has higher module efficiency (**21.89%** vs **21.57%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670?

**Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05** has a module efficiency of **21.89%**, while **Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670** is **21.57%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 use vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670?

**Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05** uses **PERC** cells; **Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670?

**Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 bifacial panels?

Both **Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05** and **Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-680](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-680) - The same specification on paper
- [Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-aaa-05) - The same specification on paper
- [Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-675) - The same specification on paper
- [Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.675.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-675-05) - The same specification on paper
- [Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.670.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-670-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.680.05 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-665](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-665) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-680-05/vikram-solar-paradea-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-670

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

