--- title: "Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-620-05" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-620-05.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05 620.05 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.36 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05) | [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-620-05) | | Manufacturer | Vikram Solar | Vikram Solar | | Power | 610 Wp | 620 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.90 % | 22.26 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 610.05 | 620.05 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 21.90 % | 22.26 % | +0.36 pp for 620.05 | | Power density | 219.0 Wp/m² | 222.6 Wp/m² | +3.6 Wp/m² for 620.05 | | Rated power | 610 Wp | 620 Wp | +10 W for 620.05 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 610.05 | 620.05 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 610 Wp | 620 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.90 % | 22.26 % | | Power density | 219.0 Wp/m² | 222.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 54.50 V | 54.90 V | | Voltage at max power | 45.70 V | 46.10 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.00 A | 14.12 A | | Current at max power | 13.36 A | 13.45 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2456x1134x35 mm | 2456x1134x35 mm | | Module area | 2.785 m² | 2.785 m² | | Weight | 35.0 kg | 35.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 57.4 kg/kWp | 56.5 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 156 | 156 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 610.05:** 20,467 kWh - **Cumulative output, 620.05:** 20,802 kWh - **Gap:** 335 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 610.05 | 620.05 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 610 W | 620 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 583 W | 592 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 555 W | 564 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 528 W | 536 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 610.05 | 620.05 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #6,847 | #5,656 | 14,129 | 620.05 leads by 1,191 places | | Power density | #6,825 | #5,563 | 14,129 | 620.05 leads by 1,262 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,152 | #6,152 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #11,277 | #10,738 | 14,129 | 620.05 leads by 539 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #4,229 | #3,459 | 14,129 | 620.05 leads by 770 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05? According to our database: **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05** has higher module efficiency (**22.26%** vs **21.90%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05? **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05** has a module efficiency of **21.90%**, while **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05** is **22.26%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05? **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05? **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05 bifacial panels? Both **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05** and **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.620.05** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-630-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.625.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-625-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.615.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-615-05) - The same specification on paper - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.605.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-605-05) - The same specification on paper - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) - 14 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.610.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) - 14 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-610-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-78-620-05 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.