--- title: "Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 leads on the differences that matter The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.040 %/°C better in heat. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | | Manufacturer | Vikram Solar | Vikram Solar | | Power | 715 Wp | 710 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.02 % | 22.86 % | | Technology | N-type | HJT | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 | SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | +0.040 %/°C for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.10 V | 50.80 V | 2.70 V apart | | Cell technology | N-type | HJT | N-type vs HJT | | Short-circuit current | 18.64 A | 17.52 A | 1.12 A apart | | Cell count | 66 | 132 | 66 cells apart | | Voltage at max power | 40.60 V | 42.43 V | 1.83 V apart | | Current at max power | 17.63 A | 16.74 A | 0.89 A apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 | SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 715 Wp | 710 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.02 % | 22.86 % | | Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.10 V | 50.80 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.60 V | 42.43 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.64 A | 17.52 A | | Current at max power | 17.63 A | 16.74 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 39.5 kg | 39.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 55.2 kg/kWp | 55.6 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.38 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | HJT | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 66 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05:** 23,990 kWh - **Cumulative output, SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05:** 23,896 kWh - **Gap:** 94 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 | SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 715 W | 710 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 683 W | 682 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 651 W | 655 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 618 W | 627 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 | SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,797 | #2,536 | 14,005 | HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 leads by 739 places | | Power density | #2,018 | #2,474 | 14,005 | HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 leads by 456 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #511 | 14,005 | SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 leads by 5,582 places | | Weight | #9,680 | #10,005 | 14,005 | HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 leads by 325 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #721 | #881 | 14,005 | HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 leads by 160 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 or Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05? According to our database: **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05** has higher module efficiency (**23.02%** vs **22.86%**); **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.260%/°C** vs **-0.300%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05? **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05** has a module efficiency of **23.02%**, while **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05** is **22.86%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 use vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05? **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05** uses **N-type** cells; **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05? **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 bifacial panels? Both **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05** and **Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) - The same specification on paper - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-705-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-700-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-695-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.690.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-690-05) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.