--- title: "Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-700-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-710" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 AAA.05-710 leads on the differences that matter The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.020 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-700-05) | [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-710) | | Manufacturer | Vikram Solar | Vikram Solar | | Power | 700 Wp | 710 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.86 % | | Technology | N-type | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 700.05 | AAA.05-710 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | +0.020 %/°C for AAA.05-710 | | Module efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.86 % | +0.33 pp for AAA.05-710 | | Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² | +3.2 Wp/m² for AAA.05-710 | | Rated power | 700 Wp | 710 Wp | +10 W for AAA.05-710 | | Cell count | 66 | 132 | 66 cells apart | | Open-circuit voltage | 47.60 V | 49.00 V | 1.40 V apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 700.05 | AAA.05-710 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 700 Wp | 710 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.86 % | | Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 47.60 V | 49.00 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.10 V | 40.80 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.43 A | 18.44 A | | Current at max power | 17.48 A | 17.41 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 39.5 kg | 39.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 56.4 kg/kWp | 55.6 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 66 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, 700.05:** 23,486 kWh - **Cumulative output, AAA.05-710:** 23,822 kWh - **Gap:** 336 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 700.05 | AAA.05-710 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 700 W | 710 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 669 W | 680 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 637 W | 650 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 606 W | 621 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 700.05 | AAA.05-710 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,982 | #2,536 | 14,005 | AAA.05-710 leads by 1,446 places | | Power density | #3,989 | #2,474 | 14,005 | AAA.05-710 leads by 1,515 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #1,309 | 14,005 | AAA.05-710 leads by 4,784 places | | Weight | #10,649 | #10,005 | 14,005 | AAA.05-710 leads by 644 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #1,210 | #881 | 14,005 | AAA.05-710 leads by 329 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710? According to our database: **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710** has higher module efficiency (**22.86%** vs **22.53%**); **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.280%/°C** vs **-0.300%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710? **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05** has a module efficiency of **22.53%**, while **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710** is **22.86%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710? **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05** uses **N-type** cells; **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710? **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 bifacial panels? Both **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05** and **Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-700-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-700-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-700-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-705-05) - The same specification on paper - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-700-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-695-05) - The same specification on paper - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.690.05](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-700-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-690-05) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-710/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-700-05/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-710 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.