--- title: "Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV vs Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV vs Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV vs Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN 715M-132DGN leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.61 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv) | [Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn) | | Manufacturer | Ulica Solar | Ulica Solar | | Power | 665 Wp | 715 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.41 % | 23.02 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 665M-132HV | 715M-132DGN | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 21.41 % | 23.02 % | +1.61 pp for 715M-132DGN | | Temperature coefficient | -0.340 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | +0.050 %/°C for 715M-132DGN | | Rated power | 665 Wp | 715 Wp | +50 W for 715M-132DGN | | Power density | 214.1 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | +16.1 Wp/m² for 715M-132DGN | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | +5 yrs for 715M-132DGN | | Annual degradation | 0.55 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | -0.15 %/yr for 715M-132DGN | | Weight | 33.3 kg | 37.4 kg | -4.1 kg for 665M-132HV | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 15 yrs | +3 yrs for 715M-132DGN | | Open-circuit voltage | 45.80 V | 48.93 V | 3.13 V apart | | Weight per kWp | 50.1 kg/kWp | 52.3 kg/kWp | -2.2 kg/kWp for 665M-132HV | | Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes | | Voltage at max power | 38.30 V | 40.99 V | 2.69 V apart | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 665M-132HV | 715M-132DGN | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 665 Wp | 715 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.41 % | 23.02 % | | Power density | 214.1 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 45.80 V | 48.93 V | | Voltage at max power | 38.30 V | 40.99 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.53 A | 18.42 A | | Current at max power | 17.36 A | 17.44 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.340 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 33.3 kg | 37.4 kg | | Weight per kWp | 50.1 kg/kWp | 52.3 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.55 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | No | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, 665M-132HV:** 21,552 kWh - **Cumulative output, 715M-132DGN:** 23,990 kWh - **Gap:** 2,438 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 665M-132HV | 715M-132DGN | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 665 W | 715 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 631 W | 684 W | 94.9% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 597 W | 653 W | 89.8% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 563 W | 622 W | 84.7% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 665M-132HV | 715M-132DGN | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #8,280 | #1,797 | 14,005 | 715M-132DGN leads by 6,483 places | | Power density | #8,250 | #2,018 | 14,005 | 715M-132DGN leads by 6,232 places | | Heat behaviour | #8,778 | #2,165 | 14,005 | 715M-132DGN leads by 6,613 places | | Weight | #3,587 | #5,769 | 14,005 | 665M-132HV leads by 2,182 places | | Warranty | #9,798 | #21 | 14,005 | 715M-132DGN leads by 9,777 places | | Overall | #3,744 | #443 | 14,005 | 715M-132DGN leads by 3,301 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV or Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN? According to our database: **Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN** has higher module efficiency (**23.02%** vs **21.41%**); **Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.290%/°C** vs **-0.340%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV and Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN? **Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV** has a module efficiency of **21.41%**, while **Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN** is **23.02%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV use vs Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN? **Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV and Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN? **Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV and Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN bifacial panels? **Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV vs Ulica Solar UL-670M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv/ulica-solar-ul-670m-132hv) - The same specification on paper - [Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV vs Ulica Solar UL-660M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv/ulica-solar-ul-660m-132hv) - The same specification on paper - [Ulica Solar UL-665M-132HV vs Ulica Solar UL-655M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv/ulica-solar-ul-655m-132hv) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-710M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn/ulica-solar-ul-710m-132dgn) - The same specification on paper - [Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn/ulica-solar-ul-705m-132dgn) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-700M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn/ulica-solar-ul-700m-132dgn) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.