---
title: "Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-460m-108bdgn/ulica-solar-ul-495m-120bdgn"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN

460M-108BDGN leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.66 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-460m-108bdgn) | [Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-495m-120bdgn) |
| Manufacturer | Ulica Solar | Ulica Solar |
| Power | 460 Wp | 495 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.02 % | 22.36 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 460M-108BDGN | 495M-120BDGN | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 23.02 % | 22.36 % | +0.66 pp for 460M-108BDGN |
| Rated power | 460 Wp | 495 Wp | +35 W for 495M-120BDGN |
| Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 223.6 Wp/m² | +6.6 Wp/m² for 460M-108BDGN |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.214 m² | 0.215 m² apart |
| Weight | 24.0 kg | 26.5 kg | -2.5 kg for 460M-108BDGN |
| Open-circuit voltage | 40.18 V | 43.52 V | 3.34 V apart |
| Cell count | 108 | 120 | 12 cells apart |
| Voltage at max power | 33.63 V | 36.85 V | 3.22 V apart |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1952x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1952x1134x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 460M-108BDGN | 495M-120BDGN |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 460 Wp | 495 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.02 % | 22.36 % |
| Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 223.6 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 40.18 V | 43.52 V |
| Voltage at max power | 33.63 V | 36.85 V |
| Short-circuit current | 14.46 A | 14.43 A |
| Current at max power | 13.68 A | 13.43 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1952x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.214 m² |
| Weight | 24.0 kg | 26.5 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 52.2 kg/kWp | 53.5 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 108 | 120 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 460M-108BDGN:** 15,434 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 495M-120BDGN:** 16,608 kWh
- **Gap:** 1,174 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 460M-108BDGN | 495M-120BDGN | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 460 W | 495 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 440 W | 473 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 420 W | 452 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 400 W | 430 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 460M-108BDGN | 495M-120BDGN | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,797 | #5,007 | 14,005 | 460M-108BDGN leads by 3,210 places |
| Power density | #1,876 | #4,950 | 14,005 | 460M-108BDGN leads by 3,074 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #5,637 | #7,516 | 14,005 | 460M-108BDGN leads by 1,879 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #7,424 | #6,963 | 14,005 | 495M-120BDGN leads by 461 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN or Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN?

According to our database: **Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN** has higher module efficiency (**23.02%** vs **22.36%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN and Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN?

**Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN** has a module efficiency of **23.02%**, while **Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN** is **22.36%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN use vs Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN?

**Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN and Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN?

**Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN and Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN bifacial panels?

Both **Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN** and **Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-505M-120BDGN](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-460m-108bdgn/ulica-solar-ul-505m-120bdgn) - 8 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-500M-120BDGN](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-460m-108bdgn/ulica-solar-ul-500m-120bdgn) - 9 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-490M-120BDGN](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-460m-108bdgn/ulica-solar-ul-490m-120bdgn) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-455M-108BDGN](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-460m-108bdgn/ulica-solar-ul-455m-108bdgn) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-450M-108BDGN](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-460m-108bdgn/ulica-solar-ul-450m-108bdgn) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Ulica Solar UL-460M-108BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-445M-108BDGN](https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-460m-108bdgn/ulica-solar-ul-445m-108bdgn) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/ulica-solar-ul-460m-108bdgn/ulica-solar-ul-495m-120bdgn

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

