---
title: "Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-730/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745

20Q-745 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-730) | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) |
| Manufacturer | Trina Solar | Trina Solar |
| Power | 730 Wp | 745 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.50 % | 24.00 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 20 730 | 20Q-745 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | +0.030 %/°C for 20Q-745 |
| Module efficiency | 23.50 % | 24.00 % | +0.50 pp for 20Q-745 |
| Power density | 235.0 Wp/m² | 239.8 Wp/m² | +4.8 Wp/m² for 20Q-745 |
| Rated power | 730 Wp | 745 Wp | +15 W for 20Q-745 |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.35 %/yr | -0.05 %/yr for 20Q-745 |
| Cell count | 132 | 264 | 132 cells apart |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 20 730 | 20Q-745 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 730 Wp | 745 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.50 % | 24.00 % |
| Power density | 235.0 Wp/m² | 239.8 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 49.90 V | 50.30 V |
| Voltage at max power | 41.70 V | 42.30 V |
| Short-circuit current | 18.58 A | 18.73 A |
| Current at max power | 17.51 A | 17.62 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 38.3 kg | 38.3 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 52.5 kg/kWp | 51.4 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.35 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 264 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, 20 730:** 24,493 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 20Q-745:** 25,191 kWh
- **Gap:** 698 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 20 730 | 20Q-745 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 730 W | 745 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 698 W | 716 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 666 W | 687 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 635 W | 658 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 20 730 | 20Q-745 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #708 | #301 | 13,953 | 20Q-745 leads by 407 places |
| Power density | #790 | #335 | 13,953 | 20Q-745 leads by 455 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,146 | #511 | 13,953 | 20Q-745 leads by 1,635 places |
| Weight | #5,958 | #4,778 | 13,953 | 20Q-745 leads by 1,180 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 13,953 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #303 | #144 | 13,953 | 20Q-745 leads by 159 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745?

According to our database: **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** has higher module efficiency (**24.00%** vs **23.50%**); **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.260%/°C** vs **-0.290%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730** has a module efficiency of **23.50%**, while **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** is **24.00%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 bifacial panels?

Both **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730** and **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-730/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-730/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) - 7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-730/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-730/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-730/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 730 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-730/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) - 6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-730/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

