---
title: "Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-620/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-640"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640

640 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-620) | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-640) |
| Manufacturer | Trina Solar | Trina Solar |
| Power | 620 Wp | 640 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.70 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 620 | 640 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.70 % | +0.70 pp for 640 |
| Power density | 229.5 Wp/m² | 236.9 Wp/m² | +7.4 Wp/m² for 640 |
| Rated power | 620 Wp | 640 Wp | +20 W for 640 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 620 | 640 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 620 Wp | 640 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.70 % |
| Power density | 229.5 Wp/m² | 236.9 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 48.50 V | 49.30 V |
| Voltage at max power | 40.24 V | 41.06 V |
| Short-circuit current | 16.26 A | 16.51 A |
| Current at max power | 15.41 A | 15.60 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2382x1134x30 mm | 2382x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 2.701 m² | 2.701 m² |
| Weight | 33.0 kg | 33.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 53.2 kg/kWp | 51.6 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 620:** 20,802 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 640:** 21,473 kWh
- **Gap:** 671 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 620 | 640 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 620 W | 640 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 593 W | 612 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 566 W | 584 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 539 W | 556 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 620 | 640 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,919 | #517 | 14,005 | 640 leads by 1,402 places |
| Power density | #2,191 | #521 | 14,005 | 640 leads by 1,670 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #7,064 | #4,940 | 14,005 | 640 leads by 2,124 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #2,537 | #1,540 | 14,005 | 640 leads by 997 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640?

According to our database: **Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640** has higher module efficiency (**23.70%** vs **23.00%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620** has a module efficiency of **23.00%**, while **Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640** is **23.70%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640 bifacial panels?

Both **Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620** and **Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-620/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-635) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-630](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-620/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-630) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-620/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-625) - The same specification on paper
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-615](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-620/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-615) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-620/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) - 14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-620/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) - 14 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-620/trina-solar-tsm-neg19rc-70-640

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

