---
title: "Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-420/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-425"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425

425 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-420) | [Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-425) |
| Manufacturer | Trina Solar | Trina Solar |
| Power | 420 Wp | 425 Wp |
| Efficiency | 21.00 % | 21.30 % |
| Technology | PERC | PERC |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 420 | 425 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 21.00 % | 21.30 % | +0.30 pp for 425 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 420 | 425 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 420 Wp | 425 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 21.00 % | 21.30 % |
| Power density | 210.2 Wp/m² | 212.7 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 50.10 V | 50.20 V |
| Voltage at max power | 42.00 V | 42.20 V |
| Short-circuit current | 10.58 A | 10.61 A |
| Current at max power | 10.01 A | 10.08 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.340 %/°C | -0.340 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² |
| Weight | 21.8 kg | 21.8 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 51.9 kg/kWp | 51.3 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.55 %/yr | 0.55 %/yr |
| Cell technology | PERC | PERC |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 144 | 144 |
| Bifacial | No | No |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 420:** 13,612 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 425:** 13,774 kWh
- **Gap:** 162 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 420 | 425 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 420 W | 425 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 399 W | 403 W | 94.9% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 377 W | 382 W | 89.8% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 356 W | 360 W | 84.7% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 420 | 425 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #9,758 | #8,519 | 14,005 | 425 leads by 1,239 places |
| Power density | #9,728 | #8,733 | 14,005 | 425 leads by 995 places |
| Heat behaviour | #8,778 | #8,778 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #5,315 | #4,677 | 14,005 | 425 leads by 638 places |
| Warranty | #9,798 | #9,798 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #11,162 | #10,872 | 14,005 | 425 leads by 290 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 or Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425?

According to our database: **Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425** has higher module efficiency (**21.30%** vs **21.00%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 and Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425?

**Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420** has a module efficiency of **21.00%**, while **Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425** is **21.30%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 use vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425?

**Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420** uses **PERC** cells; **Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 and Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425?

**Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425** has a **25 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


## Related comparisons

- [Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R-435](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-420/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-435) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-420/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-435) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R-430](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-420/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-430) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-430](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-420/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-430) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R-425](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-420/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-425) - 2 differences, the largest is product warranty
- [Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R-420](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-420/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-420) - One difference: product warranty


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-420/trina-solar-tsm-de09r-08-425

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

