--- title: "Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 NEG21C.20 740 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28) | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | | Manufacturer | Trina Solar | Trina Solar | | Power | 455 Wp | 740 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.80 % | 23.80 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 455NED9R.28 | NEG21C.20 740 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.80 % | 23.80 % | +1.00 pp for NEG21C.20 740 | | Rated power | 455 Wp | 740 Wp | +285 W for NEG21C.20 740 | | Power density | 227.7 Wp/m² | 238.2 Wp/m² | +10.5 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20 740 | | Weight | 27.0 kg | 38.3 kg | -11.3 kg for 455NED9R.28 | | Weight per kWp | 59.3 kg/kWp | 51.8 kg/kWp | -7.6 kg/kWp for NEG21C.20 740 | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 12 yrs | +3 yrs for 455NED9R.28 | | Short-circuit current | 10.77 A | 18.66 A | 7.89 A apart | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 3.106 m² | 1.108 m² apart | | Open-circuit voltage | 53.40 V | 50.30 V | 3.10 V apart | | Current at max power | 10.11 A | 17.58 A | 7.47 A apart | | Cell count | 144 | 132 | 12 cells apart | | Voltage at max power | 45.00 V | 42.10 V | 2.90 V apart | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 455NED9R.28 | NEG21C.20 740 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 455 Wp | 740 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.80 % | 23.80 % | | Power density | 227.7 Wp/m² | 238.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 53.40 V | 50.30 V | | Voltage at max power | 45.00 V | 42.10 V | | Short-circuit current | 10.77 A | 18.66 A | | Current at max power | 10.11 A | 17.58 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 27.0 kg | 38.3 kg | | Weight per kWp | 59.3 kg/kWp | 51.8 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 144 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 455NED9R.28:** 15,266 kWh - **Cumulative output, NEG21C.20 740:** 24,828 kWh - **Gap:** 9,562 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 455NED9R.28 | NEG21C.20 740 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 455 W | 740 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 435 W | 708 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 415 W | 676 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 396 W | 643 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 455NED9R.28 | NEG21C.20 740 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #2,714 | #433 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20 740 leads by 2,281 places | | Power density | #2,888 | #431 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20 740 leads by 2,457 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #12,112 | #5,125 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20 740 leads by 6,987 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #8,026 | #185 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20 740 leads by 7,841 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740? According to our database: **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740** has higher module efficiency (**23.80%** vs **22.80%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740? **Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28** has a module efficiency of **22.80%**, while **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740** is **23.80%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740? **Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740? **Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 bifacial panels? Both **Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28** and **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28/trina-solar-tsm-470ned9r-28) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-465NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28/trina-solar-tsm-465ned9r-28) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-460NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28/trina-solar-tsm-460ned9r-28) - One difference: module efficiency - [Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-450NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28/trina-solar-tsm-450ned9r-28) - One difference: module efficiency - [Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-445NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28/trina-solar-tsm-445ned9r-28) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.