---
title: "Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-425/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-435"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435

435 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-425) | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-435) |
| Manufacturer | Trina Solar | Trina Solar |
| Power | 425 Wp | 435 Wp |
| Efficiency | 21.30 % | 21.80 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 425 | 435 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 21.30 % | 21.80 % | +0.50 pp for 435 |
| Power density | 212.7 Wp/m² | 217.7 Wp/m² | +5.0 Wp/m² for 435 |
| Rated power | 425 Wp | 435 Wp | +10 W for 435 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 425 | 435 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 425 Wp | 435 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 21.30 % | 21.80 % |
| Power density | 212.7 Wp/m² | 217.7 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 50.90 V | 51.80 V |
| Voltage at max power | 42.90 V | 43.60 V |
| Short-circuit current | 10.56 A | 10.64 A |
| Current at max power | 9.92 A | 9.99 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² |
| Weight | 21.0 kg | 21.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 49.4 kg/kWp | 48.3 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 144 | 144 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 425:** 14,260 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 435:** 14,595 kWh
- **Gap:** 335 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 425 | 435 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 425 W | 435 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 407 W | 416 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 388 W | 397 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 370 W | 378 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 425 | 435 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #8,519 | #7,022 | 14,005 | 435 leads by 1,497 places |
| Power density | #8,733 | #7,066 | 14,005 | 435 leads by 1,667 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #2,909 | #2,138 | 14,005 | 435 leads by 771 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #10,224 | #9,574 | 14,005 | 435 leads by 650 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435?

According to our database: **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435** has higher module efficiency (**21.80%** vs **21.30%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425** has a module efficiency of **21.30%**, while **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435** is **21.80%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435 bifacial panels?

Both **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425** and **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-425/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-450) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-425/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-445) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-440](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-425/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-440) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-430](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-425/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-430) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-425/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) - 12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-425/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) - 12 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-425/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9rc-27-435

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

