---
title: "Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W vs Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W vs Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460w-1/trina-solar-tsm-470ned9r-28"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W vs Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28

6 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460w-1) | [Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-470ned9r-28) |
| Manufacturer | Trina Solar | Trina Solar |
| Power | 460 Wp | 470 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.50 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | NEG9R.28 460W | 470NED9R.28 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.50 % | +0.50 pp for 470NED9R.28 |
| Weight | 21.0 kg | 27.0 kg | -6.0 kg for NEG9R.28 460W |
| Weight per kWp | 45.7 kg/kWp | 57.4 kg/kWp | -11.8 kg/kWp for NEG9R.28 460W |
| Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 235.2 Wp/m² | +5.0 Wp/m² for 470NED9R.28 |
| Rated power | 460 Wp | 470 Wp | +10 W for 470NED9R.28 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | NEG9R.28 460W | 470NED9R.28 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 460 Wp | 470 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.50 % |
| Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 235.2 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 53.80 V | 54.60 V |
| Voltage at max power | 45.40 V | 46.10 V |
| Short-circuit current | 10.81 A | 10.89 A |
| Current at max power | 10.14 A | 10.20 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² |
| Weight | 21.0 kg | 27.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 45.7 kg/kWp | 57.4 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 144 | 144 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, NEG9R.28 460W:** 15,434 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 470NED9R.28:** 15,769 kWh
- **Gap:** 335 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | NEG9R.28 460W | 470NED9R.28 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 460 W | 470 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 440 W | 450 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 420 W | 429 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 400 W | 409 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | NEG9R.28 460W | 470NED9R.28 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #1,919 | #716 | 14,005 | 470NED9R.28 leads by 1,203 places |
| Power density | #1,876 | #674 | 14,005 | 470NED9R.28 leads by 1,202 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #805 | #11,218 | 14,005 | NEG9R.28 460W leads by 10,413 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #7,286 | #6,529 | 14,005 | 470NED9R.28 leads by 757 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W or Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28?

According to our database: **Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28** has higher module efficiency (**23.50%** vs **23.00%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W and Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 **460 W**** has a module efficiency of **23.00%**, while **Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28** is **23.50%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W use vs Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 **460 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W and Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 **460 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W and Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28 bifacial panels?

**Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 **460 W**** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W vs Trina Solar TSM-465NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460w-1/trina-solar-tsm-465ned9r-28) - 4 differences, the largest is weight
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28-460](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460w-1/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460-1) - The same specification on paper
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W vs Trina Solar TSM-460NEG9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460w-1/trina-solar-tsm-460neg9r-28) - 2 differences, the largest is product warranty
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W vs Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460w-1/trina-solar-tsm-460-neg9r-28) - 2 differences, the largest is product warranty
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W vs Trina Solar TSM-460NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460w-1/trina-solar-tsm-460ned9r-28) - 3 differences, the largest is weight
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 460W vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9R.28 455W](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460w-1/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-455w-1) - One difference: module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg9r-28-460w-1/trina-solar-tsm-470ned9r-28

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

