---
title: "Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28

NEG21C.20-740 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | [Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28) |
| Manufacturer | Trina Solar | Trina Solar |
| Power | 740 Wp | 455 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.80 % | 22.80 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | NEG21C.20-740 | 455NED9R.28 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 23.80 % | 22.80 % | +1.00 pp for NEG21C.20-740 |
| Rated power | 740 Wp | 455 Wp | +285 W for NEG21C.20-740 |
| Power density | 238.2 Wp/m² | 227.7 Wp/m² | +10.5 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20-740 |
| Weight | 38.3 kg | 27.0 kg | -11.3 kg for 455NED9R.28 |
| Weight per kWp | 51.8 kg/kWp | 59.3 kg/kWp | -7.6 kg/kWp for NEG21C.20-740 |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 15 yrs | +3 yrs for 455NED9R.28 |
| Short-circuit current | 18.66 A | 10.77 A | 7.89 A apart |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 1.998 m² | 1.108 m² apart |
| Open-circuit voltage | 50.30 V | 53.40 V | 3.10 V apart |
| Current at max power | 17.58 A | 10.11 A | 7.47 A apart |
| Cell count | 132 | 144 | 12 cells apart |
| Voltage at max power | 42.10 V | 45.00 V | 2.90 V apart |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | NEG21C.20-740 | 455NED9R.28 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 740 Wp | 455 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.80 % | 22.80 % |
| Power density | 238.2 Wp/m² | 227.7 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 50.30 V | 53.40 V |
| Voltage at max power | 42.10 V | 45.00 V |
| Short-circuit current | 18.66 A | 10.77 A |
| Current at max power | 17.58 A | 10.11 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 1.998 m² |
| Weight | 38.3 kg | 27.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 51.8 kg/kWp | 59.3 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 144 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, NEG21C.20-740:** 24,828 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 455NED9R.28:** 15,266 kWh
- **Gap:** 9,562 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | NEG21C.20-740 | 455NED9R.28 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 740 W | 455 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 708 W | 435 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 676 W | 415 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 643 W | 396 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | NEG21C.20-740 | 455NED9R.28 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #433 | #2,714 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20-740 leads by 2,281 places |
| Power density | #431 | #2,888 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20-740 leads by 2,457 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #5,125 | #12,112 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20-740 leads by 6,987 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #185 | #8,026 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20-740 leads by 7,841 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 or Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28?

According to our database: **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740** has higher module efficiency (**23.80%** vs **22.80%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 and Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740** has a module efficiency of **23.80%**, while **Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28** is **22.80%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 use vs Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 and Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 and Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 bifacial panels?

Both **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740** and **Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) - The same specification on paper
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-730) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-725) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-720](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-720) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-715](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-715) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-455NED9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-470NED9R.28](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28/trina-solar-tsm-470ned9r-28) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740/trina-solar-tsm-455ned9r-28

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

