---
title: "Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg18r-28-520-1/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745

NEG21C.20Q-745 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 225 W more power. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg18r-28-520-1) | [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) |
| Manufacturer | Trina Solar | Trina Solar |
| Power | 520 Wp | 745 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.40 % | 24.00 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | NEG18R.28-520 | NEG21C.20Q-745 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 520 Wp | 745 Wp | +225 W for NEG21C.20Q-745 |
| Module efficiency | 23.40 % | 24.00 % | +0.60 pp for NEG21C.20Q-745 |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | +0.030 %/°C for NEG21C.20Q-745 |
| Weight | 23.5 kg | 38.3 kg | -14.8 kg for NEG18R.28-520 |
| Weight per kWp | 45.2 kg/kWp | 51.4 kg/kWp | -6.2 kg/kWp for NEG18R.28-520 |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 12 yrs | +3 yrs for NEG18R.28-520 |
| Open-circuit voltage | 41.20 V | 50.30 V | 9.10 V apart |
| Short-circuit current | 15.99 A | 18.73 A | 2.74 A apart |
| Module area | 2.224 m² | 3.106 m² | 0.883 m² apart |
| Power density | 233.8 Wp/m² | 239.8 Wp/m² | +6.0 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20Q-745 |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.35 %/yr | -0.05 %/yr for NEG21C.20Q-745 |
| Voltage at max power | 34.10 V | 42.30 V | 8.20 V apart |
| Current at max power | 15.25 A | 17.62 A | 2.37 A apart |
| Cell count | 108 | 264 | 156 cells apart |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |
| Dimensions | 1961x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | NEG18R.28-520 | NEG21C.20Q-745 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 520 Wp | 745 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.40 % | 24.00 % |
| Power density | 233.8 Wp/m² | 239.8 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 41.20 V | 50.30 V |
| Voltage at max power | 34.10 V | 42.30 V |
| Short-circuit current | 15.99 A | 18.73 A |
| Current at max power | 15.25 A | 17.62 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1961x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm |
| Module area | 2.224 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 23.5 kg | 38.3 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 45.2 kg/kWp | 51.4 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.35 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 108 | 264 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, NEG18R.28-520:** 17,447 kWh
- **Cumulative output, NEG21C.20Q-745:** 25,191 kWh
- **Gap:** 7,744 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | NEG18R.28-520 | NEG21C.20Q-745 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 520 W | 745 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 497 W | 716 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 475 W | 687 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 452 W | 658 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | NEG18R.28-520 | NEG21C.20Q-745 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #882 | #303 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20Q-745 leads by 579 places |
| Power density | #909 | #339 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20Q-745 leads by 570 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #511 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20Q-745 leads by 1,654 places |
| Weight | #635 | #4,803 | 14,005 | NEG18R.28-520 leads by 4,168 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #4,727 | #150 | 14,005 | NEG21C.20Q-745 leads by 4,577 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745?

According to our database: **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** has higher module efficiency (**24.00%** vs **23.40%**); **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.260%/°C** vs **-0.290%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520** has a module efficiency of **23.40%**, while **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** is **24.00%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 bifacial panels?

**Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-515](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg18r-28-520-1/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg18r-28-515-1) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) - The same specification on paper
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg18r-28-520-1/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

