---
title: "Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/tongwei-thc-g12-66-bifacial/tongwei-twmnh-48hc"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC

THC G12-66 Bifacial leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 7.14 pp more efficient. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial](https://comparepv.com/panel/tongwei-thc-g12-66-bifacial) | [Tongwei TWMNH-48HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tongwei-twmnh-48hc) |
| Manufacturer | Tongwei | Tongwei |
| Power | 740 Wp | 450 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.80 % | 16.66 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | THC G12-66 Bifacial | TWMNH-48HC | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 23.80 % | 16.66 % | +7.14 pp for THC G12-66 Bifacial |
| Rated power | 740 Wp | 450 Wp | +290 W for THC G12-66 Bifacial |
| Power density | 238.2 Wp/m² | 166.6 Wp/m² | +71.6 Wp/m² for THC G12-66 Bifacial |
| Weight | 37.0 kg | 29.0 kg | -8.0 kg for TWMNH-48HC |
| Weight per kWp | 50.0 kg/kWp | 64.4 kg/kWp | -14.4 kg/kWp for THC G12-66 Bifacial |
| Open-circuit voltage | 50.62 V | 35.03 V | 15.59 V apart |
| Short-circuit current | 18.47 A | 16.05 A | 2.42 A apart |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.701 m² | 0.405 m² apart |
| Voltage at max power | 42.32 V | 30.08 V | 12.24 V apart |
| Current at max power | 17.49 A | 14.97 A | 2.52 A apart |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2382x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | THC G12-66 Bifacial | TWMNH-48HC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 740 Wp | 450 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.80 % | 16.66 % |
| Power density | 238.2 Wp/m² | 166.6 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 50.62 V | 35.03 V |
| Voltage at max power | 42.32 V | 30.08 V |
| Short-circuit current | 18.47 A | 16.05 A |
| Current at max power | 17.49 A | 14.97 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2382x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 2.701 m² |
| Weight | 37.0 kg | 29.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 50.0 kg/kWp | 64.4 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | - | - |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, THC G12-66 Bifacial:** 24,828 kWh
- **Cumulative output, TWMNH-48HC:** 15,098 kWh
- **Gap:** 9,730 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | THC G12-66 Bifacial | TWMNH-48HC | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 740 W | 450 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 709 W | 431 W | 95.8% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 678 W | 412 W | 91.6% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 647 W | 393 W | 87.4% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | THC G12-66 Bifacial | TWMNH-48HC | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #433 | #13,534 | 14,005 | THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 13,101 places |
| Power density | #431 | #13,523 | 14,005 | THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 13,092 places |
| Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #1,309 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #3,317 | #12,985 | 14,005 | THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 9,668 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #130 | #12,508 | 14,005 | THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 12,378 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial or Tongwei TWMNH-48HC?

According to our database: **Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial** has higher module efficiency (**23.80%** vs **16.66%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TWMNH-48HC?

**Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial** has a module efficiency of **23.80%**, while **Tongwei TWMNH-48HC** is **16.66%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial use vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC?

**Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Tongwei TWMNH-48HC** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TWMNH-48HC?

**Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Tongwei TWMNH-48HC** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TWMNH-48HC bifacial panels?

Both **Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial** and **Tongwei TWMNH-48HC** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD](https://comparepv.com/compare/tongwei-thc-g12-66-bifacial/tongwei-twmnf-66hd) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HS](https://comparepv.com/compare/tongwei-thc-g12-66-bifacial/tongwei-twmnh-66hs) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HD](https://comparepv.com/compare/tongwei-thc-g12-66-bifacial/tongwei-twmnh-66hd) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-54HD](https://comparepv.com/compare/tongwei-thc-g12-66-bifacial/tongwei-twmnh-54hd) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750](https://comparepv.com/compare/tongwei-thc-g12-66-bifacial/tongwei-solar-twmnf-66hd750) - 4 differences, the largest is product warranty
- [Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745](https://comparepv.com/compare/tongwei-thc-g12-66-bifacial/tongwei-solar-twmnf-66hd745) - 2 differences, the largest is product warranty


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/tongwei-thc-g12-66-bifacial/tongwei-twmnh-48hc

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

