--- title: "TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr435/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 ND66-GK725 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.50 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr435) | [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725) | | Manufacturer | TCL Zhonghuan | TCL Zhonghuan | | Power | 435 Wp | 725 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.80 % | 23.30 % | | Technology | TOPCon | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | ND48-GR435 | ND66-GK725 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 21.80 % | 23.30 % | +1.50 pp for ND66-GK725 | | Rated power | 435 Wp | 725 Wp | +290 W for ND66-GK725 | | Power density | 217.7 Wp/m² | 233.4 Wp/m² | +15.7 Wp/m² for ND66-GK725 | | Weight | 24.5 kg | 38.2 kg | -13.7 kg for ND48-GR435 | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 15 yrs | +10 yrs for ND48-GR435 | | Open-circuit voltage | 34.96 V | 49.36 V | 14.40 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 15.85 A | 18.60 A | 2.75 A apart | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 3.106 m² | 1.108 m² apart | | Weight per kWp | 56.3 kg/kWp | 52.7 kg/kWp | -3.6 kg/kWp for ND66-GK725 | | Cell technology | TOPCon | N-type | TOPCon vs N-type | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | +0.010 %/°C for ND66-GK725 | | Voltage at max power | 29.54 V | 41.27 V | 11.73 V apart | | Current at max power | 14.73 A | 17.57 A | 2.84 A apart | | Cell count | 96 | 132 | 36 cells apart | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | ND48-GR435 | ND66-GK725 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 435 Wp | 725 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.80 % | 23.30 % | | Power density | 217.7 Wp/m² | 233.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 34.96 V | 49.36 V | | Voltage at max power | 29.54 V | 41.27 V | | Short-circuit current | 15.85 A | 18.60 A | | Current at max power | 14.73 A | 17.57 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 24.5 kg | 38.2 kg | | Weight per kWp | 56.3 kg/kWp | 52.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 96 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, ND48-GR435:** 14,595 kWh - **Cumulative output, ND66-GK725:** 24,325 kWh - **Gap:** 9,730 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | ND48-GR435 | ND66-GK725 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 435 W | 725 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 416 W | 695 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 397 W | 664 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 378 W | 634 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | ND48-GR435 | ND66-GK725 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #7,022 | #1,017 | 14,005 | ND66-GK725 leads by 6,005 places | | Power density | #7,066 | #936 | 14,005 | ND66-GK725 leads by 6,130 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #1,309 | 14,005 | ND66-GK725 leads by 856 places | | Weight | #10,568 | #6,337 | 14,005 | ND66-GK725 leads by 4,231 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #7,707 | #266 | 14,005 | ND66-GK725 leads by 7,441 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 or TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725? According to our database: **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** has higher module efficiency (**23.30%** vs **21.80%**); **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.280%/°C** vs **-0.290%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725? **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435** has a module efficiency of **21.80%**, while **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** is **23.30%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 use vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725? **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435** uses **TOPCon** cells; **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725? **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435** has a **30 years** power warranty; **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 bifacial panels? Both **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435** and **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR455](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr435/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr455) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR450](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr435/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr450) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR445](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr435/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr445) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR435 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND48-GR440](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr435/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr440) - One difference: module efficiency - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK720](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk720) - The same specification on paper - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK715](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk715) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd48-gr435/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.