--- title: "TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-bd54-wa460/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 BD54-WA460 leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 265 W more power. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-bd54-wa460) | [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725) | | Manufacturer | TCL Zhonghuan | TCL Zhonghuan | | Power | 460 Wp | 725 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.10 % | 23.30 % | | Technology | Back Contact | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | BD54-WA460 | ND66-GK725 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 460 Wp | 725 Wp | +265 W for ND66-GK725 | | Weight | 21.5 kg | 38.2 kg | -16.7 kg for BD54-WA460 | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 15 yrs | +10 yrs for BD54-WA460 | | Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | +0.020 %/°C for BD54-WA460 | | Weight per kWp | 46.7 kg/kWp | 52.7 kg/kWp | -6.0 kg/kWp for BD54-WA460 | | Open-circuit voltage | 41.06 V | 49.36 V | 8.30 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 14.25 A | 18.60 A | 4.35 A apart | | Module area | 1.992 m² | 3.106 m² | 1.114 m² apart | | Cell technology | Back Contact | N-type | Back Contact vs N-type | | Module efficiency | 23.10 % | 23.30 % | +0.20 pp for ND66-GK725 | | Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | -0.05 %/yr for BD54-WA460 | | Voltage at max power | 34.62 V | 41.27 V | 6.65 V apart | | Current at max power | 13.29 A | 17.57 A | 4.28 A apart | | Cell count | 108 | 132 | 24 cells apart | | Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes | | Dimensions | 1757x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1757x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | BD54-WA460 | ND66-GK725 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 460 Wp | 725 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.10 % | 23.30 % | | Power density | 230.9 Wp/m² | 233.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 41.06 V | 49.36 V | | Voltage at max power | 34.62 V | 41.27 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.25 A | 18.60 A | | Current at max power | 13.29 A | 17.57 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.280 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1757x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 1.992 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 21.5 kg | 38.2 kg | | Weight per kWp | 46.7 kg/kWp | 52.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | Back Contact | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 132 | | Bifacial | No | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, BD54-WA460:** 15,554 kWh - **Cumulative output, ND66-GK725:** 24,325 kWh - **Gap:** 8,771 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | BD54-WA460 | ND66-GK725 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 460 W | 725 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 442 W | 695 W | 95.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 424 W | 664 W | 91.6% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 406 W | 634 W | 87.4% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | BD54-WA460 | ND66-GK725 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,570 | #1,017 | 14,005 | ND66-GK725 leads by 553 places | | Power density | #1,638 | #936 | 14,005 | ND66-GK725 leads by 702 places | | Heat behaviour | #511 | #1,309 | 14,005 | BD54-WA460 leads by 798 places | | Weight | #1,324 | #6,337 | 14,005 | BD54-WA460 leads by 5,013 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #5,043 | #266 | 14,005 | ND66-GK725 leads by 4,777 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 or TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725? According to our database: **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** has higher module efficiency (**23.30%** vs **23.10%**); **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.260%/°C** vs **-0.280%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725? **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460** has a module efficiency of **23.10%**, while **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** is **23.30%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 use vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725? **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460** uses **Back Contact** cells; **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725? **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460** has a **30 years** power warranty; **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 bifacial panels? **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-bd54-wa460/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-bd54-wa475) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA470](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-bd54-wa460/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-bd54-wa470) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-bd54-wa460/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-bd54-wa465) - One difference: module efficiency - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK720](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk720) - The same specification on paper - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK715](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk715) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK710](https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk710) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-bd54-wa460/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.