--- title: "Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Waaree BiN-08-560 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Waaree BiN-08-560 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b/waaree-bin-08-560" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b/waaree-bin-08-560.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Waaree BiN-08-560 BiN-08-560 leads on the differences that matter The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.070 %/°C better in heat. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B](https://comparepv.com/panel/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b) | [Waaree BiN-08-560](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bin-08-560) | | Manufacturer | Tata Power Solar | Waaree | | Power | 585 Wp | 560 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.00 % | 21.67 % | | Technology | PERC | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | TP585LG10B | BiN-08-560 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Temperature coefficient | -0.370 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | +0.070 %/°C for BiN-08-560 | | Module efficiency | 21.00 % | 21.67 % | +0.67 pp for BiN-08-560 | | Annual degradation | 0.60 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | -0.20 %/yr for BiN-08-560 | | Weight | 36.0 kg | 32.0 kg | -4.0 kg for BiN-08-560 | | Rated power | 585 Wp | 560 Wp | +25 W for TP585LG10B | | Power density | 210.0 Wp/m² | 216.7 Wp/m² | +6.6 Wp/m² for BiN-08-560 | | Module area | 2.785 m² | 2.584 m² | 0.201 m² apart | | Weight per kWp | 61.5 kg/kWp | 57.1 kg/kWp | -4.4 kg/kWp for BiN-08-560 | | Open-circuit voltage | 53.73 V | 50.70 V | 3.03 V apart | | Cell technology | PERC | TOPCon | PERC vs TOPCon | | Voltage at max power | 46.10 V | 42.00 V | 4.10 V apart | | Cell count | 156 | 144 | 12 cells apart | | Short-circuit current | 13.20 A | 14.11 A | 0.91 A apart | | Dimensions | 2456x1134x35 mm | 2279x1134x35 mm | 2456x1134x35 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm | | Current at max power | 12.69 A | 13.34 A | 0.65 A apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | TP585LG10B | BiN-08-560 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 585 Wp | 560 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.00 % | 21.67 % | | Power density | 210.0 Wp/m² | 216.7 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 53.73 V | 50.70 V | | Voltage at max power | 46.10 V | 42.00 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.20 A | 14.11 A | | Current at max power | 12.69 A | 13.34 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.370 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2456x1134x35 mm | 2279x1134x35 mm | | Module area | 2.785 m² | 2.584 m² | | Weight | 36.0 kg | 32.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 61.5 kg/kWp | 57.1 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.60 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | PERC | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 156 | 144 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, TP585LG10B:** 18,701 kWh - **Cumulative output, BiN-08-560:** 18,789 kWh - **Gap:** 88 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | TP585LG10B | BiN-08-560 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 585 W | 560 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 553 W | 535 W | 94.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 520 W | 510 W | 88.9% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 488 W | 484 W | 83.3% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | TP585LG10B | BiN-08-560 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #9,828 | #7,652 | 14,129 | BiN-08-560 leads by 2,176 places | | Power density | #9,836 | #7,602 | 14,129 | BiN-08-560 leads by 2,234 places | | Heat behaviour | #13,161 | #6,152 | 14,129 | BiN-08-560 leads by 7,009 places | | Weight | #12,756 | #11,138 | 14,129 | BiN-08-560 leads by 1,618 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #6,113 | #6,166 | 14,129 | TP585LG10B leads by 53 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B or Waaree BiN-08-560? According to our database: **Waaree BiN-08-560** has higher module efficiency (**21.67%** vs **21.00%**); **Waaree BiN-08-560** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.300%/°C** vs **-0.370%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B and Waaree BiN-08-560? **Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B** has a module efficiency of **21.00%**, while **Waaree BiN-08-560** is **21.67%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B use vs Waaree BiN-08-560? **Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B** uses **PERC** cells; **Waaree BiN-08-560** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B and Waaree BiN-08-560? **Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Waaree BiN-08-560** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B and Waaree BiN-08-560 bifacial panels? Both **Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B** and **Waaree BiN-08-560** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B](https://comparepv.com/compare/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b/tata-power-solar-tp642lg10b) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B](https://comparepv.com/compare/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b/tata-power-solar-tp637lg10b) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP631LG10B](https://comparepv.com/compare/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b/tata-power-solar-tp631lg10b) - 7 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP626LG10B](https://comparepv.com/compare/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b/tata-power-solar-tp626lg10b) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP621LG10B](https://comparepv.com/compare/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b/tata-power-solar-tp621lg10b) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP615LG10B](https://comparepv.com/compare/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b/tata-power-solar-tp615lg10b) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/tata-power-solar-tp585lg10b/waaree-bin-08-560 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.