--- title: "Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W 610W leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.90 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w) | [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w) | | Manufacturer | Sun Earth | Sun Earth | | Power | 560 Wp | 610 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.70 % | 23.60 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 560W | 610W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 21.70 % | 23.60 % | +1.90 pp for 610W | | Rated power | 560 Wp | 610 Wp | +50 W for 610W | | Power density | 216.8 Wp/m² | 236.1 Wp/m² | +19.4 Wp/m² for 610W | | Weight per kWp | 57.1 kg/kWp | 52.5 kg/kWp | -4.7 kg/kWp for 610W | | Open-circuit voltage | 50.10 V | 52.50 V | 2.40 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 14.13 A | 14.76 A | 0.63 A apart | | Current at max power | 13.30 A | 14.15 A | 0.85 A apart | | Voltage at max power | 42.10 V | 43.10 V | 1.00 V apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 560W | 610W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 560 Wp | 610 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.70 % | 23.60 % | | Power density | 216.8 Wp/m² | 236.1 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 50.10 V | 52.50 V | | Voltage at max power | 42.10 V | 43.10 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.13 A | 14.76 A | | Current at max power | 13.30 A | 14.15 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2278x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 2.583 m² | 2.583 m² | | Weight | 32.0 kg | 32.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 57.1 kg/kWp | 52.5 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 144 | 144 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 560W:** 18,789 kWh - **Cumulative output, 610W:** 20,467 kWh - **Gap:** 1,678 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 560W | 610W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 560 W | 610 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 536 W | 583 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 511 W | 557 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 487 W | 530 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 560W | 610W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #7,421 | #627 | 14,005 | 610W leads by 6,794 places | | Power density | #7,452 | #623 | 14,005 | 610W leads by 6,829 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #11,052 | #5,988 | 14,005 | 610W leads by 5,064 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #6,069 | #2,224 | 14,005 | 610W leads by 3,845 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W or Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W? According to our database: **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.60%** vs **21.70%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W? **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **560 W**** has a module efficiency of **21.70%**, while **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** is **23.60%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W use vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W? **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **560 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W? **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **560 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W bifacial panels? Both **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **560 W**** and **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-600w) - 7 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 590W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-590w) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-580w) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 570W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-570w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-610) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72H-600](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-600) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.