--- title: "Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-430/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W 13 differences, and they point both ways The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-430) | [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w) | | Manufacturer | Sun Earth | Sun Earth | | Power | 430 Wp | 610 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.00 % | 23.60 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 54HBG-430 | 72HBG 610W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.00 % | 23.60 % | +1.60 pp for 72HBG 610W | | Rated power | 430 Wp | 610 Wp | +180 W for 72HBG 610W | | Power density | 220.2 Wp/m² | 236.1 Wp/m² | +15.9 Wp/m² for 72HBG 610W | | Performance warranty | 40 yrs | 30 yrs | +10 yrs for 54HBG-430 | | Weight | 24.5 kg | 32.0 kg | -7.5 kg for 54HBG-430 | | Product warranty | 40 yrs | 12 yrs | +28 yrs for 54HBG-430 | | Open-circuit voltage | 38.30 V | 52.50 V | 14.20 V apart | | Module area | 1.953 m² | 2.583 m² | 0.631 m² apart | | Weight per kWp | 57.0 kg/kWp | 52.5 kg/kWp | -4.5 kg/kWp for 72HBG 610W | | Voltage at max power | 31.80 V | 43.10 V | 11.30 V apart | | Cell count | 108 | 144 | 36 cells apart | | Dimensions | 1722x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm | 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm | | Current at max power | 13.52 A | 14.15 A | 0.63 A apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 54HBG-430 | 72HBG 610W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 430 Wp | 610 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.00 % | 23.60 % | | Power density | 220.2 Wp/m² | 236.1 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 38.30 V | 52.50 V | | Voltage at max power | 31.80 V | 43.10 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.29 A | 14.76 A | | Current at max power | 13.52 A | 14.15 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1722x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.953 m² | 2.583 m² | | Weight | 24.5 kg | 32.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 57.0 kg/kWp | 52.5 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 40 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 40 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 144 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 54HBG-430:** 14,427 kWh - **Cumulative output, 72HBG 610W:** 20,467 kWh - **Gap:** 6,040 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 54HBG-430 | 72HBG 610W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 430 W | 610 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 411 W | 583 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 393 W | 557 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 374 W | 530 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 54HBG-430 | 72HBG 610W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #6,452 | #621 | 13,953 | 72HBG 610W leads by 5,831 places | | Power density | #6,417 | #617 | 13,953 | 72HBG 610W leads by 5,800 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,146 | #2,146 | 13,953 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #10,895 | #5,953 | 13,953 | 72HBG 610W leads by 4,942 places | | Warranty | #1 | #21 | 13,953 | 54HBG-430 leads by 20 places | | Overall | #2,420 | #2,202 | 13,953 | 72HBG 610W leads by 218 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 or Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W? According to our database: **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.60%** vs **22.00%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W? **Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430** has a module efficiency of **22.00%**, while **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** is **23.60%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 use vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W? **Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W? **Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430** has a **40 years** power warranty; **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W bifacial panels? Both **Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430** and **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **610 W**** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-455](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-430/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-455) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-450](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-430/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-450) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-430/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-440) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-430/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-435) - One difference: module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-420](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-430/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-420) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-600w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm8-54hbg-430/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.