---
title: "Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm10-48h-475w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-600w"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W

DXM10-48H 475W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 125 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm10-48h-475w) | [Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-600w) |
| Manufacturer | Sun Earth | Sun Earth |
| Power | 475 Wp | 600 Wp |
| Efficiency | 23.80 % | 23.20 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | DXM10-48H 475W | DXM8-72HBG 600W | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 475 Wp | 600 Wp | +125 W for DXM8-72HBG 600W |
| Module efficiency | 23.80 % | 23.20 % | +0.60 pp for DXM10-48H 475W |
| Weight | 21.0 kg | 32.0 kg | -11.0 kg for DXM10-48H 475W |
| Weight per kWp | 44.2 kg/kWp | 53.3 kg/kWp | -9.1 kg/kWp for DXM10-48H 475W |
| Open-circuit voltage | 36.88 V | 52.10 V | 15.22 V apart |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.583 m² | 0.585 m² apart |
| Power density | 237.7 Wp/m² | 232.3 Wp/m² | +5.5 Wp/m² for DXM10-48H 475W |
| Short-circuit current | 15.94 A | 14.64 A | 1.30 A apart |
| Voltage at max power | 31.45 V | 42.90 V | 11.45 V apart |
| Cell count | 96 | 144 | 48 cells apart |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |
| Current at max power | 15.11 A | 13.99 A | 1.12 A apart |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | DXM10-48H 475W | DXM8-72HBG 600W |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 475 Wp | 600 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 23.80 % | 23.20 % |
| Power density | 237.7 Wp/m² | 232.3 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 36.88 V | 52.10 V |
| Voltage at max power | 31.45 V | 42.90 V |
| Short-circuit current | 15.94 A | 14.64 A |
| Current at max power | 15.11 A | 13.99 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.583 m² |
| Weight | 21.0 kg | 32.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 44.2 kg/kWp | 53.3 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 96 | 144 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, DXM10-48H 475W:** 15,937 kWh
- **Cumulative output, DXM8-72HBG 600W:** 20,131 kWh
- **Gap:** 4,194 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | DXM10-48H 475W | DXM8-72HBG 600W | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 475 W | 600 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 454 W | 574 W | 95.7% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 434 W | 548 W | 91.3% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 413 W | 522 W | 87.0% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | DXM10-48H 475W | DXM8-72HBG 600W | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #433 | #1,306 | 14,005 | DXM10-48H 475W leads by 873 places |
| Power density | #467 | #1,252 | 14,005 | DXM10-48H 475W leads by 785 places |
| Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #396 | #7,236 | 14,005 | DXM10-48H 475W leads by 6,840 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #6,407 | #2,960 | 14,005 | DXM8-72HBG 600W leads by 3,447 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W or Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W?

According to our database: **Sun Earth DXM10-48H **475 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.80%** vs **23.20%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W?

**Sun Earth DXM10-48H **475 W**** has a module efficiency of **23.80%**, while **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **600 W**** is **23.20%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W use vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W?

**Sun Earth DXM10-48H **475 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **600 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W?

**Sun Earth DXM10-48H **475 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **600 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W bifacial panels?

**Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG **600 W**** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Sun Earth DXM10-48H **475 W**** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm10-48h-475w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w) - 12 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 590W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm10-48h-475w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-590w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm10-48h-475w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-580w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 570W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm10-48h-475w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-570w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm10-48h-475w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-560w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-60HBG 505W](https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm10-48h-475w/sun-earth-dxm8-60hbg-505w) - 13 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/sun-earth-dxm10-48h-475w/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-600w

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

