--- title: "SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/spolarpv-spv535-pm10-144/spolarpv-spv695-tg12-132bd" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD SPV695-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 1.68 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv535-pm10-144) | [SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv695-tg12-132bd) | | Manufacturer | SpolarPV | SpolarPV | | Power | 535 Wp | 695 Wp | | Efficiency | 20.73 % | 22.41 % | | Technology | PERC | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | SPV535-PM10-144 | SPV695-TG12-132BD | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 20.73 % | 22.41 % | +1.68 pp for SPV695-TG12-132BD | | Temperature coefficient | -0.350 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | +0.050 %/°C for SPV695-TG12-132BD | | Rated power | 535 Wp | 695 Wp | +160 W for SPV695-TG12-132BD | | Power density | 207.3 Wp/m² | 224.0 Wp/m² | +16.7 Wp/m² for SPV695-TG12-132BD | | Weight | 26.5 kg | 38.0 kg | -11.5 kg for SPV535-PM10-144 | | Short-circuit current | 13.52 A | 18.31 A | 4.79 A apart | | Module area | 2.581 m² | 3.103 m² | 0.522 m² apart | | Weight per kWp | 49.5 kg/kWp | 54.7 kg/kWp | -5.1 kg/kWp for SPV535-PM10-144 | | Cell technology | PERC | TOPCon | PERC vs TOPCon | | Current at max power | 12.75 A | 17.28 A | 4.53 A apart | | Cell count | 144 | 132 | 12 cells apart | | Open-circuit voltage | 49.78 V | 48.07 V | 1.71 V apart | | Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes | | Dimensions | 2278x1133x30 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm | 2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm | | Voltage at max power | 41.94 V | 40.25 V | 1.69 V apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | SPV535-PM10-144 | SPV695-TG12-132BD | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 535 Wp | 695 Wp | | Module efficiency | 20.73 % | 22.41 % | | Power density | 207.3 Wp/m² | 224.0 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 49.78 V | 48.07 V | | Voltage at max power | 41.94 V | 40.25 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.52 A | 18.31 A | | Current at max power | 12.75 A | 17.28 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.350 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2278x1133x30 mm | 2383x1302x30 mm | | Module area | 2.581 m² | 3.103 m² | | Weight | 26.5 kg | 38.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 49.5 kg/kWp | 54.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.45 %/yr | 0.46 %/yr | | Cell technology | PERC | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 144 | 132 | | Bifacial | No | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, SPV535-PM10-144:** 17,618 kWh - **Cumulative output, SPV695-TG12-132BD:** 22,869 kWh - **Gap:** 5,251 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | SPV535-PM10-144 | SPV695-TG12-132BD | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 535 W | 695 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 507 W | 664 W | 94.8% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 479 W | 632 W | 89.5% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 451 W | 601 W | 84.2% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | SPV535-PM10-144 | SPV695-TG12-132BD | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #10,701 | #4,771 | 14,005 | SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 5,930 places | | Power density | #10,731 | #4,779 | 14,005 | SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 5,952 places | | Heat behaviour | #10,419 | #6,093 | 14,005 | SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 4,326 places | | Weight | #3,074 | #9,072 | 14,005 | SPV535-PM10-144 leads by 5,998 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #8,124 | #1,358 | 14,005 | SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 6,766 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 or SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD? According to our database: **SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD** has higher module efficiency (**22.41%** vs **20.73%**); **SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.300%/°C** vs **-0.350%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD? **SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144** has a module efficiency of **20.73%**, while **SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD** is **22.41%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 use vs SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD? **SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144** uses **PERC** cells; **SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD? **SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144** has a **30 years** power warranty; **SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD bifacial panels? **SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144](https://comparepv.com/compare/spolarpv-spv535-pm10-144/spolarpv-spv560-pm10-144) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV555-PM10-144](https://comparepv.com/compare/spolarpv-spv535-pm10-144/spolarpv-spv555-pm10-144) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV550-PM10-144](https://comparepv.com/compare/spolarpv-spv535-pm10-144/spolarpv-spv550-pm10-144) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV545-PM10-144](https://comparepv.com/compare/spolarpv-spv535-pm10-144/spolarpv-spv545-pm10-144) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV540-PM10-144](https://comparepv.com/compare/spolarpv-spv535-pm10-144/spolarpv-spv540-pm10-144) - The same specification on paper - [SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/spolarpv-spv695-tg12-132bd/spolarpv-spv700-tg12-132bd) - The same specification on paper --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/spolarpv-spv535-pm10-144/spolarpv-spv695-tg12-132bd Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.