--- title: "Solarever SE-182*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Solarever SE-182*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd" updated: 2026-09-25 --- # Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD 625M-132-BD leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 170 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd) | [Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd) | | Manufacturer | Solarever | Solarever | | Power | 455 Wp | 625 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.77 % | 23.13 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 455M-96-BD | 625M-132-BD | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 455 Wp | 625 Wp | +170 W for 625M-132-BD | | Weight | 23.0 kg | 32.4 kg | -9.4 kg for 455M-96-BD | | Module efficiency | 22.77 % | 23.13 % | +0.36 pp for 625M-132-BD | | Open-circuit voltage | 35.21 V | 49.19 V | 13.98 V apart | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.701 m² | 0.703 m² apart | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | +0.010 %/°C for 625M-132-BD | | Power density | 227.7 Wp/m² | 231.4 Wp/m² | +3.7 Wp/m² for 625M-132-BD | | Voltage at max power | 30.26 V | 41.69 V | 11.43 V apart | | Cell count | 96 | 132 | 36 cells apart | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2382x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 455M-96-BD | 625M-132-BD | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 455 Wp | 625 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.77 % | 23.13 % | | Power density | 227.7 Wp/m² | 231.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 35.21 V | 49.19 V | | Voltage at max power | 30.26 V | 41.69 V | | Short-circuit current | 16.10 A | 16.19 A | | Current at max power | 15.04 A | 14.99 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2382x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 2.701 m² | | Weight | 23.0 kg | 32.4 kg | | Weight per kWp | 50.5 kg/kWp | 51.8 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 96 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, 455M-96-BD:** 15,266 kWh - **Cumulative output, 625M-132-BD:** 20,970 kWh - **Gap:** 5,704 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 455M-96-BD | 625M-132-BD | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 455 W | 625 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 435 W | 598 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 414 W | 571 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 394 W | 543 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 455M-96-BD | 625M-132-BD | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,073 | #1,563 | 14,005 | 625M-132-BD leads by 1,510 places | | Power density | #2,888 | #1,513 | 14,005 | 625M-132-BD leads by 1,375 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #2,165 | 14,005 | 625M-132-BD leads by 3,928 places | | Weight | #3,925 | #5,218 | 14,005 | 455M-96-BD leads by 1,293 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #7,882 | #1,833 | 14,005 | 625M-132-BD leads by 6,049 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD or Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD? According to our database: **Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD** has higher module efficiency (**23.13%** vs **22.77%**); **Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.290%/°C** vs **-0.300%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD? **Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD** has a module efficiency of **22.77%**, while **Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD** is **23.13%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD use vs Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD? **Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD? **Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD bifacial panels? Both **Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD** and **Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-470M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-470m-96-bd) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-460M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-460m-96-bd) - One difference: module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-450m-96-bd) - One difference: module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-630M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd/solarever-se-182-105-630m-132-bd) - The same specification on paper - [Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-620M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd/solarever-se-182-105-620m-132-bd) - The same specification on paper --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.