--- title: "Solarever SE-182*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Solarever SE-182*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd" updated: 2026-09-25 --- # Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD 465M-96-BD leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd) | [Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd) | | Manufacturer | Solarever | Solarever | | Power | 455 Wp | 465 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.77 % | 23.27 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 455M-96-BD | 465M-96-BD | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.77 % | 23.27 % | +0.50 pp for 465M-96-BD | | Power density | 227.7 Wp/m² | 232.7 Wp/m² | +5.0 Wp/m² for 465M-96-BD | | Rated power | 455 Wp | 465 Wp | +10 W for 465M-96-BD | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 455M-96-BD | 465M-96-BD | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 455 Wp | 465 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.77 % | 23.27 % | | Power density | 227.7 Wp/m² | 232.7 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 35.21 V | 35.57 V | | Voltage at max power | 30.26 V | 30.62 V | | Short-circuit current | 16.10 A | 16.20 A | | Current at max power | 15.04 A | 15.19 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² | | Weight | 23.0 kg | 23.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 50.5 kg/kWp | 49.5 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 96 | 96 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 455M-96-BD:** 15,266 kWh - **Cumulative output, 465M-96-BD:** 15,602 kWh - **Gap:** 336 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 455M-96-BD | 465M-96-BD | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 455 W | 465 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 435 W | 444 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 414 W | 423 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 394 W | 402 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 455M-96-BD | 465M-96-BD | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,073 | #1,202 | 14,005 | 465M-96-BD leads by 1,871 places | | Power density | #2,888 | #1,115 | 14,005 | 465M-96-BD leads by 1,773 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #3,925 | #2,991 | 14,005 | 465M-96-BD leads by 934 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #7,882 | #6,858 | 14,005 | 465M-96-BD leads by 1,024 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD or Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD? According to our database: **Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD** has higher module efficiency (**23.27%** vs **22.77%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD? **Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD** has a module efficiency of **22.77%**, while **Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD** is **23.27%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD use vs Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD? **Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD? **Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD bifacial panels? Both **Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD** and **Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-470M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-470m-96-bd) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-460M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-460m-96-bd) - One difference: module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-450m-96-bd) - One difference: module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-630M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-630m-132-bd) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power - [Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-620M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-620m-132-bd) - 8 differences, the largest is rated power --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.