---
title: "Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf/shinson-technology-s710m66ht4bf"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF

S710M66HT4BF leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.33 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf) | [Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s710m66ht4bf) |
| Manufacturer | Shinson Technology | Shinson Technology |
| Power | 700 Wp | 710 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.86 % |
| Technology | HJT | HJT |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | S700M66HT4BF | S710M66HT4BF | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.86 % | +0.33 pp for S710M66HT4BF |
| Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² | +3.2 Wp/m² for S710M66HT4BF |
| Rated power | 700 Wp | 710 Wp | +10 W for S710M66HT4BF |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | S700M66HT4BF | S710M66HT4BF |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 700 Wp | 710 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.86 % |
| Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 50.13 V | 50.44 V |
| Voltage at max power | 42.10 V | 42.39 V |
| Short-circuit current | 17.43 A | 17.55 A |
| Current at max power | 16.63 A | 16.75 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 38.7 kg | 38.7 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 55.3 kg/kWp | 54.5 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.35 %/yr | 0.35 %/yr |
| Cell technology | HJT | HJT |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, S700M66HT4BF:** 23,669 kWh
- **Cumulative output, S710M66HT4BF:** 24,007 kWh
- **Gap:** 338 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | S700M66HT4BF | S710M66HT4BF | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 700 W | 710 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 673 W | 682 W | 96.1% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 645 W | 655 W | 92.2% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 618 W | 627 W | 88.3% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | S700M66HT4BF | S710M66HT4BF | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #3,982 | #2,536 | 14,005 | S710M66HT4BF leads by 1,446 places |
| Power density | #3,989 | #2,474 | 14,005 | S710M66HT4BF leads by 1,515 places |
| Heat behaviour | #511 | #511 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #9,733 | #8,842 | 14,005 | S710M66HT4BF leads by 891 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #116 | #62 | 14,005 | S710M66HT4BF leads by 54 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF or Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF?

According to our database: **Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF** has higher module efficiency (**22.86%** vs **22.53%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF and Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF?

**Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF** has a module efficiency of **22.53%**, while **Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF** is **22.86%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF use vs Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF?

**Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF** uses **HJT** cells; **Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF and Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF?

**Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF and Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF bifacial panels?

Both **Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF** and **Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf/shinson-technology-s720m66ht4bf) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf/shinson-technology-s715m66ht4bf) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S705M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf/shinson-technology-s705m66ht4bf) - The same specification on paper
- [Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf/shinson-technology-s700m66nt4bf) - 7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
- [Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf/shinson-technology-s695m66nt4bf) - 7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
- [Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S690M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/compare/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf/shinson-technology-s690m66nt4bf) - 10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf/shinson-technology-s710m66ht4bf

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

