--- title: "Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/seraphim-seg-495-btb-bg/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG SRP-730-BHC-BG leads on the differences that matter The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.042 %/°C better in heat. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-seg-495-btb-bg) | [Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | | Manufacturer | Seraphim | Seraphim | | Power | 495 Wp | 730 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.87 % | 23.50 % | | Technology | N-type | HJT | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | SEG-495-BTB-BG | SRP-730-BHC-BG | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.258 %/°C | +0.042 %/°C for SRP-730-BHC-BG | | Rated power | 495 Wp | 730 Wp | +235 W for SRP-730-BHC-BG | | Module efficiency | 22.87 % | 23.50 % | +0.63 pp for SRP-730-BHC-BG | | Weight | 27.3 kg | 38.5 kg | -11.2 kg for SEG-495-BTB-BG | | Power density | 228.7 Wp/m² | 235.0 Wp/m² | +6.3 Wp/m² for SRP-730-BHC-BG | | Open-circuit voltage | 43.80 V | 51.12 V | 7.32 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 14.20 A | 17.80 A | 3.60 A apart | | Module area | 2.165 m² | 3.106 m² | 0.942 m² apart | | Cell technology | N-type | HJT | N-type vs HJT | | Voltage at max power | 36.60 V | 43.10 V | 6.50 V apart | | Current at max power | 13.52 A | 17.00 A | 3.48 A apart | | Cell count | 120 | 132 | 12 cells apart | | Weight per kWp | 55.2 kg/kWp | 52.7 kg/kWp | -2.4 kg/kWp for SRP-730-BHC-BG | | Dimensions | 1909x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1909x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | SEG-495-BTB-BG | SRP-730-BHC-BG | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 495 Wp | 730 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.87 % | 23.50 % | | Power density | 228.7 Wp/m² | 235.0 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 43.80 V | 51.12 V | | Voltage at max power | 36.60 V | 43.10 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.20 A | 17.80 A | | Current at max power | 13.52 A | 17.00 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.258 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1909x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 2.165 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 27.3 kg | 38.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 55.2 kg/kWp | 52.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.34 %/yr | 0.30 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | HJT | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 120 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, SEG-495-BTB-BG:** 16,643 kWh - **Cumulative output, SRP-730-BHC-BG:** 24,874 kWh - **Gap:** 8,231 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | SEG-495-BTB-BG | SRP-730-BHC-BG | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 495 W | 730 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 473 W | 702 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 450 W | 673 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 428 W | 645 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | SEG-495-BTB-BG | SRP-730-BHC-BG | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #2,531 | #716 | 14,005 | SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 1,815 places | | Power density | #2,456 | #800 | 14,005 | SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 1,656 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #466 | 14,005 | SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 5,627 places | | Weight | #9,577 | #6,396 | 14,005 | SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 3,181 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #6,379 | #208 | 14,005 | SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 6,171 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG or Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG? According to our database: **Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG** has higher module efficiency (**23.50%** vs **22.87%**); **Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.258%/°C** vs **-0.300%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG? **Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG** has a module efficiency of **22.87%**, while **Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG** is **23.50%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG use vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG? **Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG** uses **N-type** cells; **Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG? **Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG bifacial panels? Both **Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG** and **Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG](https://comparepv.com/compare/seraphim-seg-495-btb-bg/seraphim-seg-490-btb-bg) - One difference: module efficiency - [Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-485-BTB-BG](https://comparepv.com/compare/seraphim-seg-495-btb-bg/seraphim-seg-485-btb-bg) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-480-BTB-BG](https://comparepv.com/compare/seraphim-seg-495-btb-bg/seraphim-seg-480-btb-bg) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-475-BTB-BG](https://comparepv.com/compare/seraphim-seg-495-btb-bg/seraphim-seg-475-btb-bg) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-470-BTB-BG](https://comparepv.com/compare/seraphim-seg-495-btb-bg/seraphim-seg-470-btb-bg) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG](https://comparepv.com/compare/seraphim-seg-495-btb-bg/seraphim-seg-465-btb-bg) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/seraphim-seg-495-btb-bg/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.