--- title: "Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 vs Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 vs Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-465" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-465.png" updated: 2026-09-12 --- # Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 vs Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465 465 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460) | [Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-465) | | Manufacturer | Runergy | Runergy | | Power | 460 Wp | 465 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.30 % | | Technology | N-type | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 460 | 465 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.30 % | +0.30 pp for 465 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 460 | 465 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 460 Wp | 465 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.00 % | 23.30 % | | Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 232.7 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 35.52 V | 35.65 V | | Voltage at max power | 29.70 V | 29.83 V | | Short-circuit current | 16.23 A | 16.31 A | | Current at max power | 15.49 A | 15.59 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 1.998 m² | | Weight | 25.0 kg | 25.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 54.3 kg/kWp | 53.8 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 96 | 96 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 460:** 15,434 kWh - **Cumulative output, 465:** 15,602 kWh - **Gap:** 168 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 460 | 465 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 460 W | 465 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 440 W | 445 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 420 W | 425 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 400 W | 404 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 460 | 465 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,970 | #1,057 | 14,129 | 465 leads by 913 places | | Power density | #1,927 | #1,156 | 14,129 | 465 leads by 771 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,220 | #2,220 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #8,717 | #7,900 | 14,129 | 465 leads by 817 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #8,254 | #7,649 | 14,129 | 465 leads by 605 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 or Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465? According to our database: **Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465** has higher module efficiency (**23.30%** vs **23.00%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 and Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465? **Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460** has a module efficiency of **23.00%**, while **Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465** is **23.30%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 use vs Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465? **Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460** uses **N-type** cells; **Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 and Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465? **Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Runergy HY-DH96N11B-465** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 vs Runergy HY-DH96N11B-455](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-455) - One difference: module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 vs Runergy HY-DH96N11B-450](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-450) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 vs Runergy HY-DH96N11B-445](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-445) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) - 15 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) - 15 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH96N11B-460 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) - 15 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-460/runergy-hy-dh96n11b-465 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.