--- title: "Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730 Plus-730 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 17 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Runergy HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | [Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | | Manufacturer | Runergy | Runergy | | Power | 725 Wp | 730 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.30 % | 23.50 % | | Technology | HJT | HJT | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 725 | Plus-730 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 23.30 % | 23.50 % | +0.20 pp for Plus-730 | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 725 | Plus-730 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 725 Wp | 730 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.30 % | 23.50 % | | Power density | 233.4 Wp/m² | 235.0 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 50.89 V | 51.04 V | | Voltage at max power | 42.83 V | 42.97 V | | Short-circuit current | 17.73 A | 17.79 A | | Current at max power | 16.93 A | 16.99 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.260 %/°C | -0.260 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 38.3 kg | 38.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 52.8 kg/kWp | 52.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.38 %/yr | 0.38 %/yr | | Cell technology | HJT | HJT | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 725:** 24,401 kWh - **Cumulative output, Plus-730:** 24,569 kWh - **Gap:** 168 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 725 | Plus-730 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 725 W | 730 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 697 W | 702 W | 96.1% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 668 W | 673 W | 92.2% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 640 W | 645 W | 88.3% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 725 | Plus-730 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,006 | #708 | 13,953 | Plus-730 leads by 298 places | | Power density | #926 | #790 | 13,953 | Plus-730 leads by 136 places | | Heat behaviour | #511 | #511 | 13,953 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #6,476 | #6,358 | 13,953 | Plus-730 leads by 118 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 13,953 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #414 | #313 | 13,953 | Plus-730 leads by 101 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 or Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730? According to our database: **Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730** has higher module efficiency (**23.50%** vs **23.30%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730? **Runergy HY-DH132H10-725** has a module efficiency of **23.30%**, while **Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730** is **23.50%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 use vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730? **Runergy HY-DH132H10-725** uses **HJT** cells; **Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730? **Runergy HY-DH132H10-725** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730 bifacial panels? Both **Runergy HY-DH132H10-725** and **Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) - One difference: module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH132H10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) - 8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.