--- title: "Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh108n11-505/runergy-hy-dh108n11-515" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 515 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Runergy HY-DH108N11-505](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh108n11-505) | [Runergy HY-DH108N11-515](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh108n11-515) | | Manufacturer | Runergy | Runergy | | Power | 505 Wp | 515 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.70 % | 23.20 % | | Technology | N-type | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 505 | 515 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.70 % | 23.20 % | +0.50 pp for 515 | | Power density | 227.1 Wp/m² | 231.6 Wp/m² | +4.5 Wp/m² for 515 | | Rated power | 505 Wp | 515 Wp | +10 W for 515 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 505 | 515 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 505 Wp | 515 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.70 % | 23.20 % | | Power density | 227.1 Wp/m² | 231.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 40.29 V | 40.89 V | | Voltage at max power | 33.49 V | 33.89 V | | Short-circuit current | 15.88 A | 15.98 A | | Current at max power | 15.08 A | 15.20 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1961x1134x30 mm | 1961x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 2.224 m² | 2.224 m² | | Weight | 27.5 kg | 27.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 54.5 kg/kWp | 53.4 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 108 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 505:** 16,944 kWh - **Cumulative output, 515:** 17,279 kWh - **Gap:** 335 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 505 | 515 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 505 W | 515 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 483 W | 493 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 461 W | 470 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 439 W | 448 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 505 | 515 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,266 | #1,289 | 13,953 | 515 leads by 1,977 places | | Power density | #3,271 | #1,454 | 13,953 | 515 leads by 1,817 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,146 | #2,146 | 13,953 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #8,751 | #7,277 | 13,953 | 515 leads by 1,474 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 13,953 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #6,799 | #5,787 | 13,953 | 515 leads by 1,012 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 or Runergy HY-DH108N11-515? According to our database: **Runergy HY-DH108N11-515** has higher module efficiency (**23.20%** vs **22.70%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-515? **Runergy HY-DH108N11-505** has a module efficiency of **22.70%**, while **Runergy HY-DH108N11-515** is **23.20%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 use vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-515? **Runergy HY-DH108N11-505** uses **N-type** cells; **Runergy HY-DH108N11-515** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-515? **Runergy HY-DH108N11-505** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Runergy HY-DH108N11-515** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 bifacial panels? Both **Runergy HY-DH108N11-505** and **Runergy HY-DH108N11-515** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-530](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh108n11-505/runergy-hy-dh108n11-530) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-525](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh108n11-505/runergy-hy-dh108n11-525) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-520](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh108n11-505/runergy-hy-dh108n11-520) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-510](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh108n11-505/runergy-hy-dh108n11-510) - One difference: module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-500](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh108n11-505/runergy-hy-dh108n11-500) - One difference: module efficiency - [Runergy HY-DH108N11-505 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh108n11-505/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) - 14 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/runergy-hy-dh108n11-505/runergy-hy-dh108n11-515 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.