---
title: "Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700bhdg/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG

720BHDG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700bhdg) | [Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) |
| Manufacturer | Risen | Risen |
| Power | 700 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Efficiency | 22.50 % | 23.20 % |
| Technology | HJT | HJT |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 700BHDG | 720BHDG | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 22.50 % | 23.20 % | +0.70 pp for 720BHDG |
| Weight | 35.0 kg | 40.0 kg | -5.0 kg for 700BHDG |
| Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² | +6.4 Wp/m² for 720BHDG |
| Weight per kWp | 50.0 kg/kWp | 55.6 kg/kWp | -5.6 kg/kWp for 700BHDG |
| Rated power | 700 Wp | 720 Wp | +20 W for 720BHDG |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x30 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | 2384x1303x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 700BHDG | 720BHDG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 700 Wp | 720 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 22.50 % | 23.20 % |
| Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 49.83 V | 50.18 V |
| Voltage at max power | 41.78 V | 42.08 V |
| Short-circuit current | 17.82 A | 18.19 A |
| Current at max power | 16.77 A | 17.13 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.240 %/°C | -0.240 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2384x1303x30 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm |
| Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² |
| Weight | 35.0 kg | 40.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 50.0 kg/kWp | 55.6 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.30 %/yr | 0.30 %/yr |
| Cell technology | HJT | HJT |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 132 | 132 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 700BHDG:** 23,852 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 720BHDG:** 24,533 kWh
- **Gap:** 681 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 700BHDG | 720BHDG | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 700 W | 720 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 675 W | 694 W | 96.4% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 650 W | 668 W | 92.8% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 624 W | 642 W | 89.2% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 700BHDG | 720BHDG | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #4,222 | #1,306 | 14,005 | 720BHDG leads by 2,916 places |
| Power density | #3,989 | #1,347 | 14,005 | 720BHDG leads by 2,642 places |
| Heat behaviour | #13 | #13 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #3,317 | #9,909 | 14,005 | 700BHDG leads by 6,592 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #912 | #351 | 14,005 | 720BHDG leads by 561 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG or Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG?

According to our database: **Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG** has higher module efficiency (**23.20%** vs **22.50%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG?

**Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG** has a module efficiency of **22.50%**, while **Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG** is **23.20%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG use vs Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG?

**Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG** uses **HJT** cells; **Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG?

**Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG bifacial panels?

Both **Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG** and **Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/compare/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700bhdg/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/compare/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700bhdg/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/compare/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700bhdg/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/compare/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700bhdg/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-705BHDG](https://comparepv.com/compare/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700bhdg/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-705bhdg) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG](https://comparepv.com/compare/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700bhdg/risen-rsm132-8-695bhdg) - The same specification on paper


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700bhdg/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

