---
title: "Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/renew-photovoltaics-rps1mh60mbxxx/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd575"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/renew-photovoltaics-rps1mh60mbxxx/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd575.png"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575

RPS2MH72BD575 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.77 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps1mh60mbxxx) | [Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd575) |
| Manufacturer | Renew Photovoltaics | Renew Photovoltaics |
| Power | 610 Wp | 575 Wp |
| Efficiency | 21.49 % | 22.26 % |
| Technology | PERC | TOPCon |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | RPS1MH60MBXXX | RPS2MH72BD575 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 21.49 % | 22.26 % | +0.77 pp for RPS2MH72BD575 |
| Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | +5 yrs for RPS2MH72BD575 |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.330 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | +0.030 %/°C for RPS2MH72BD575 |
| Rated power | 610 Wp | 575 Wp | +35 W for RPS1MH60MBXXX |
| Annual degradation | 0.55 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | -0.15 %/yr for RPS2MH72BD575 |
| Power density | 214.9 Wp/m² | 222.6 Wp/m² | +7.6 Wp/m² for RPS2MH72BD575 |
| Weight per kWp | 50.8 kg/kWp | 56.5 kg/kWp | -5.7 kg/kWp for RPS1MH60MBXXX |
| Open-circuit voltage | 41.95 V | 52.90 V | 10.95 V apart |
| Short-circuit current | 18.41 A | 13.58 A | 4.83 A apart |
| Module area | 2.838 m² | 2.583 m² | 0.255 m² apart |
| Cell technology | PERC | TOPCon | PERC vs TOPCon |
| Weight | 31.0 kg | 32.5 kg | -1.5 kg for RPS1MH60MBXXX |
| Voltage at max power | 34.78 V | 44.61 V | 9.83 V apart |
| Current at max power | 17.54 A | 12.89 A | 4.65 A apart |
| Cell count | 120 | 144 | 24 cells apart |
| Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes |
| Dimensions | 2178x1303x35 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm | 2178x1303x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | RPS1MH60MBXXX | RPS2MH72BD575 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 610 Wp | 575 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 21.49 % | 22.26 % |
| Power density | 214.9 Wp/m² | 222.6 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 41.95 V | 52.90 V |
| Voltage at max power | 34.78 V | 44.61 V |
| Short-circuit current | 18.41 A | 13.58 A |
| Current at max power | 17.54 A | 12.89 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.330 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 2178x1303x35 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 2.838 m² | 2.583 m² |
| Weight | 31.0 kg | 32.5 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 50.8 kg/kWp | 56.5 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.55 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | PERC | TOPCon |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 120 | 144 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

- **Cumulative output, RPS1MH60MBXXX:** 19,769 kWh
- **Cumulative output, RPS2MH72BD575:** 19,292 kWh
- **Gap:** 477 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | RPS1MH60MBXXX | RPS2MH72BD575 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 610 W | 575 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 580 W | 549 W | 95.0% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 550 W | 523 W | 90.1% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 519 W | 497 W | 85.2% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | RPS1MH60MBXXX | RPS2MH72BD575 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #8,208 | #5,656 | 14,129 | RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,552 places |
| Power density | #8,082 | #5,612 | 14,129 | RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,470 places |
| Heat behaviour | #8,613 | #6,152 | 14,129 | RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,461 places |
| Weight | #4,244 | #10,781 | 14,129 | RPS1MH60MBXXX leads by 6,537 places |
| Warranty | #9,912 | #21 | 14,129 | RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 9,891 places |
| Overall | #5,588 | #5,025 | 14,129 | RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 563 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX or Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?

According to our database: **Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575** has higher module efficiency (**22.26%** vs **21.49%**); **Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.300%/°C** vs **-0.330%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?

**Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX** has a module efficiency of **21.49%**, while **Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575** is **22.26%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX use vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?

**Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX** uses **PERC** cells; **Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?

**Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


### Are Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 bifacial panels?

**Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.


## Related comparisons

- [Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590](https://comparepv.com/compare/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd575/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd590) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD585](https://comparepv.com/compare/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd575/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd585) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD580](https://comparepv.com/compare/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd575/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd580) - The same specification on paper
- [Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD570](https://comparepv.com/compare/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd575/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd570) - The same specification on paper
- [Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS3MH66BDXXX](https://comparepv.com/compare/renew-photovoltaics-rps1mh60mbxxx/renew-photovoltaics-rps3mh66bdxxx) - 16 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560](https://comparepv.com/compare/renew-photovoltaics-rps1mh60mbxxx/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd560) - 14 differences, the largest is rated power


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/renew-photovoltaics-rps1mh60mbxxx/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd575

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.