--- title: "Recom RCM-720-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Recom RCM-720-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Recom RCM-720-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM Identical on every published parameter All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Recom RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) | [Recom RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) | | Manufacturer | Recom | Recom | | Power | 720 Wp | 725 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.20 % | 23.30 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 720-8DBNM | 725-8DBNM | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 720 Wp | 725 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.20 % | 23.30 % | | Power density | 231.8 Wp/m² | 233.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 49.23 V | 49.41 V | | Voltage at max power | 41.10 V | 41.27 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.54 A | 18.64 A | | Current at max power | 17.52 A | 17.57 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 37.8 kg | 37.8 kg | | Weight per kWp | 52.5 kg/kWp | 52.1 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 720-8DBNM:** 24,157 kWh - **Cumulative output, 725-8DBNM:** 24,325 kWh - **Gap:** 168 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 720-8DBNM | 725-8DBNM | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 720 W | 725 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 689 W | 693 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 657 W | 662 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 626 W | 630 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 720-8DBNM | 725-8DBNM | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,306 | #1,017 | 14,005 | 725-8DBNM leads by 289 places | | Power density | #1,347 | #936 | 14,005 | 725-8DBNM leads by 411 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #2,165 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #6,043 | #5,609 | 14,005 | 725-8DBNM leads by 434 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #23 | #14 | 14,005 | 725-8DBNM leads by 9 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Recom RCM-720-8DBNM or Recom RCM-725-8DBNM? According to our database: **Recom RCM-725-8DBNM** has higher module efficiency (**23.30%** vs **23.20%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Recom RCM-720-8DBNM and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM? **Recom RCM-720-8DBNM** has a module efficiency of **23.20%**, while **Recom RCM-725-8DBNM** is **23.30%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Recom RCM-720-8DBNM use vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM? **Recom RCM-720-8DBNM** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Recom RCM-725-8DBNM** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Recom RCM-720-8DBNM and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM? **Recom RCM-720-8DBNM** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Recom RCM-725-8DBNM** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Recom RCM-720-8DBNM and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM bifacial panels? Both **Recom RCM-720-8DBNM** and **Recom RCM-725-8DBNM** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Recom RCM-720-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Recom RCM-720-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) - One difference: module efficiency - [Recom RCM-720-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm/recom-rcm-715-8nm) - 5 differences, the largest is weight - [Recom RCM-720-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Recom RCM-720-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm/recom-rcm-710-8nm) - 8 differences, the largest is weight - [Recom RCM-720-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-705-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm/recom-rcm-705-8dbnm) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.