--- title: "Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM 10 differences, and they point both ways The largest is rated power: 255 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series) | [Recom RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) | | Manufacturer | Recom | Recom | | Power | 465 Wp | 720 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.27 % | 23.20 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | 720-8DBNM | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 465 Wp | 720 Wp | +255 W for 720-8DBNM | | Weight | 25.0 kg | 37.8 kg | -12.8 kg for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | | Open-circuit voltage | 36.10 V | 49.23 V | 13.13 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 16.24 A | 18.54 A | 2.30 A apart | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 3.106 m² | 1.108 m² apart | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | +0.010 %/°C for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | | Voltage at max power | 30.40 V | 41.10 V | 10.70 V apart | | Current at max power | 15.30 A | 17.52 A | 2.22 A apart | | Cell count | 192 | 132 | 60 cells apart | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | 720-8DBNM | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 465 Wp | 720 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.27 % | 23.20 % | | Power density | 232.7 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 36.10 V | 49.23 V | | Voltage at max power | 30.40 V | 41.10 V | | Short-circuit current | 16.24 A | 18.54 A | | Current at max power | 15.30 A | 17.52 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 25.0 kg | 37.8 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.8 kg/kWp | 52.5 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 192 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series):** 15,602 kWh - **Cumulative output, 720-8DBNM:** 24,157 kWh - **Gap:** 8,555 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | 720-8DBNM | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 465 W | 720 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 445 W | 689 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 426 W | 657 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 406 W | 626 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | 720-8DBNM | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,202 | #1,306 | 14,005 | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 104 places | | Power density | #1,115 | #1,347 | 14,005 | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 232 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #2,165 | 14,005 | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 856 places | | Weight | #7,824 | #6,043 | 14,005 | 720-8DBNM leads by 1,781 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #3,845 | #23 | 14,005 | 720-8DBNM leads by 3,822 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) or Recom RCM-720-8DBNM? According to our database: **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** has higher module efficiency (**23.27%** vs **23.20%**); **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.280%/°C** vs **-0.290%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-720-8DBNM? **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** has a module efficiency of **23.27%**, while **Recom RCM-720-8DBNM** is **23.20%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) use vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM? **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Recom RCM-720-8DBNM** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-720-8DBNM? **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Recom RCM-720-8DBNM** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-720-8DBNM bifacial panels? Both **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** and **Recom RCM-720-8DBNM** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-715-8nm) - 12 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) - 12 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-710-8nm) - 13 differences, the largest is rated power --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.