--- title: "Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8NM - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8NM side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-710-8nm" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8NM 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 245 W more power. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series) | [Recom RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8nm) | | Manufacturer | Recom | Recom | | Power | 465 Wp | 710 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.27 % | 22.86 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | 710-8NM | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 465 Wp | 710 Wp | +245 W for 710-8NM | | Weight | 25.0 kg | 33.9 kg | -8.9 kg for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | | Module efficiency | 23.27 % | 22.86 % | +0.41 pp for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | +0.020 %/°C for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | | Weight per kWp | 53.8 kg/kWp | 47.7 kg/kWp | -6.0 kg/kWp for 710-8NM | | Open-circuit voltage | 36.10 V | 48.70 V | 12.60 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 16.24 A | 18.35 A | 2.11 A apart | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 3.106 m² | 1.108 m² apart | | Power density | 232.7 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² | +4.2 Wp/m² for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | | Voltage at max power | 30.40 V | 40.90 V | 10.50 V apart | | Current at max power | 15.30 A | 17.37 A | 2.07 A apart | | Bifacial | Yes | No | Yes vs No | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x30 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | 710-8NM | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 465 Wp | 710 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.27 % | 22.86 % | | Power density | 232.7 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 36.10 V | 48.70 V | | Voltage at max power | 30.40 V | 40.90 V | | Short-circuit current | 16.24 A | 18.35 A | | Current at max power | 15.30 A | 17.37 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.280 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x30 mm | | Module area | 1.998 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 25.0 kg | 33.9 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.8 kg/kWp | 47.7 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 192 | - | | Bifacial | Yes | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series):** 15,602 kWh - **Cumulative output, 710-8NM:** 23,822 kWh - **Gap:** 8,220 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | 710-8NM | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 465 W | 710 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 445 W | 678 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 426 W | 646 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 406 W | 614 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) | 710-8NM | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,202 | #2,536 | 14,005 | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 1,334 places | | Power density | #1,115 | #2,474 | 14,005 | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 1,359 places | | Heat behaviour | #1,309 | #6,093 | 14,005 | 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 4,784 places | | Weight | #7,824 | #1,881 | 14,005 | 710-8NM leads by 5,943 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #3,845 | #54 | 14,005 | 710-8NM leads by 3,791 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) or Recom RCM-710-8NM? According to our database: **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** has higher module efficiency (**23.27%** vs **22.86%**); **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.280%/°C** vs **-0.300%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-710-8NM? **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** has a module efficiency of **23.27%**, while **Recom RCM-710-8NM** is **22.86%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) use vs Recom RCM-710-8NM? **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Recom RCM-710-8NM** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-710-8NM? **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Recom RCM-710-8NM** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-710-8NM bifacial panels? **Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Recom RCM-710-8NM** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) - 10 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) - 11 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-715-8nm) - 12 differences, the largest is rated power - [Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) - 12 differences, the largest is rated power --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/recom-rcm-465-rdbnaa-lynx-series/recom-rcm-710-8nm Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.