--- title: "Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r/premier-energies-pe-132-625-thgb-g12r" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r/premier-energies-pe-132-625-thgb-g12r.png" updated: 2026-10-23 --- # Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R 625-THGB-G12R leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.55 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R](https://comparepv.com/panel/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r) | [Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R](https://comparepv.com/panel/premier-energies-pe-132-625-thgb-g12r) | | Manufacturer | Premier Energies | Premier Energies | | Power | 610 Wp | 625 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.58 % | 23.13 % | | Technology | N-type | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 610-THGB-G12R | 625-THGB-G12R | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.58 % | 23.13 % | +0.55 pp for 625-THGB-G12R | | Power density | 225.8 Wp/m² | 231.4 Wp/m² | +5.6 Wp/m² for 625-THGB-G12R | | Rated power | 610 Wp | 625 Wp | +15 W for 625-THGB-G12R | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 610-THGB-G12R | 625-THGB-G12R | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 610 Wp | 625 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.58 % | 23.13 % | | Power density | 225.8 Wp/m² | 231.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 49.06 V | 49.47 V | | Voltage at max power | 41.39 V | 41.94 V | | Short-circuit current | 15.62 A | 15.64 A | | Current at max power | 14.74 A | 14.90 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2382x1134x35 mm | 2382x1134x35 mm | | Module area | 2.701 m² | 2.701 m² | | Weight | 33.5 kg | 33.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 54.9 kg/kWp | 53.6 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 610-THGB-G12R:** 20,467 kWh - **Cumulative output, 625-THGB-G12R:** 20,970 kWh - **Gap:** 503 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 610-THGB-G12R | 625-THGB-G12R | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 610 W | 625 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 583 W | 598 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 557 W | 571 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 530 W | 543 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 610-THGB-G12R | 625-THGB-G12R | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,887 | #1,609 | 14,129 | 625-THGB-G12R leads by 2,278 places | | Power density | #3,788 | #1,558 | 14,129 | 625-THGB-G12R leads by 2,230 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,220 | #2,220 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #9,375 | #7,672 | 14,129 | 625-THGB-G12R leads by 1,703 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #3,381 | #2,276 | 14,129 | 625-THGB-G12R leads by 1,105 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R or Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R? According to our database: **Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R** has higher module efficiency (**23.13%** vs **22.58%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R? **Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R** has a module efficiency of **22.58%**, while **Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R** is **23.13%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R use vs Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R? **Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R** uses **N-type** cells; **Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R? **Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R bifacial panels? Both **Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R** and **Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R](https://comparepv.com/compare/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r/premier-energies-pe-132-630-thgb-g12r) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R](https://comparepv.com/compare/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r/premier-energies-pe-132-620-thgb-g12r) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-615-THGB-G12R](https://comparepv.com/compare/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r/premier-energies-pe-132-615-thgb-g12r) - The same specification on paper - [Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R](https://comparepv.com/compare/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r/premier-energies-pe-132-605-thgb-g12r) - The same specification on paper - [Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R](https://comparepv.com/compare/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r/premier-energies-pe-132-600-thgb-g12r) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10\_1A](https://comparepv.com/compare/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r/premier-energies-pe-590-tb-m10-1a) - 13 differences, the largest is weight --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/premier-energies-pe-132-610-thgb-g12r/premier-energies-pe-132-625-thgb-g12r Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.