--- title: "Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.33 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh) | [Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | | Manufacturer | Phono Solar | Phono Solar | | Power | 700 Wp | 710 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.86 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | PS710M13GFH-22/WNH | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.86 % | +0.33 pp for PS710M13GFH-22/WNH | | Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² | +3.2 Wp/m² for PS710M13GFH-22/WNH | | Rated power | 700 Wp | 710 Wp | +10 W for PS710M13GFH-22/WNH | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | PS710M13GFH-22/WNH | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 700 Wp | 710 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.86 % | | Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 228.6 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.42 V | 48.82 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.39 V | 40.76 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.38 A | 18.50 A | | Current at max power | 17.35 A | 17.45 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 37.7 kg | 37.7 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.9 kg/kWp | 53.1 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, PS700M13GFH-22/WNH:** 23,486 kWh - **Cumulative output, PS710M13GFH-22/WNH:** 23,822 kWh - **Gap:** 336 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | PS710M13GFH-22/WNH | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 700 W | 710 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 670 W | 679 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 639 W | 648 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 609 W | 617 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | PS710M13GFH-22/WNH | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #4,041 | #2,591 | 14,129 | PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 1,450 places | | Power density | #4,048 | #2,529 | 14,129 | PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 1,519 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,220 | #2,220 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #8,080 | #6,938 | 14,129 | PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 1,142 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #937 | #618 | 14,129 | PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 319 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH or Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH? According to our database: **Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH** has higher module efficiency (**22.86%** vs **22.53%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH? **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** has a module efficiency of **22.53%**, while **Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH** is **22.86%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH use vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH? **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH? **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH bifacial panels? Both **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** and **Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) - The same specification on paper - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps695m13gfh-22-wnh) - The same specification on paper - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps690m13gfh-22-wnh) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) - 7 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) - 7 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.