--- title: "Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH Identical on every published parameter All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh) | [Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | | Manufacturer | Phono Solar | Phono Solar | | Power | 700 Wp | 705 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.70 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | PS705M13GFH-22/WNH | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 700 Wp | 705 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.53 % | 22.70 % | | Power density | 225.3 Wp/m² | 227.0 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.42 V | 48.62 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.39 V | 40.58 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.38 A | 18.44 A | | Current at max power | 17.35 A | 17.40 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 37.7 kg | 37.7 kg | | Weight per kWp | 53.9 kg/kWp | 53.5 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, PS700M13GFH-22/WNH:** 23,486 kWh - **Cumulative output, PS705M13GFH-22/WNH:** 23,654 kWh - **Gap:** 168 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | PS705M13GFH-22/WNH | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 700 W | 705 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 670 W | 674 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 639 W | 644 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 609 W | 613 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | PS705M13GFH-22/WNH | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #4,041 | #3,364 | 14,129 | PS705M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 677 places | | Power density | #4,048 | #3,418 | 14,129 | PS705M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 630 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,220 | #2,220 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #8,080 | #7,503 | 14,129 | PS705M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 577 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #937 | #759 | 14,129 | PS705M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 178 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH or Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH? According to our database: **Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH** has higher module efficiency (**22.70%** vs **22.53%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH? **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** has a module efficiency of **22.53%**, while **Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH** is **22.70%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH use vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH? **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH? **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH bifacial panels? Both **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** and **Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps695m13gfh-22-wnh) - The same specification on paper - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps690m13gfh-22-wnh) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) - 7 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) - 11 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) - 7 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.