--- title: "Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH NS-730MH-132 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.97 pp more efficient. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Phono Solar NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | [Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh) | | Manufacturer | Phono Solar | Phono Solar | | Power | 730 Wp | 700 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.50 % | 22.53 % | | Technology | N-type | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | NS-730MH-132 | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 23.50 % | 22.53 % | +0.97 pp for NS-730MH-132 | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | +5 yrs for PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | | Power density | 235.0 Wp/m² | 225.3 Wp/m² | +9.7 Wp/m² for NS-730MH-132 | | Rated power | 730 Wp | 700 Wp | +30 W for NS-730MH-132 | | Weight | 34.0 kg | 37.7 kg | -3.7 kg for NS-730MH-132 | | Weight per kWp | 46.6 kg/kWp | 53.9 kg/kWp | -7.3 kg/kWp for NS-730MH-132 | | Cell technology | N-type | TOPCon | N-type vs TOPCon | | Open-circuit voltage | 50.16 V | 48.42 V | 1.74 V apart | | Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm | | Voltage at max power | 42.19 V | 40.39 V | 1.80 V apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | NS-730MH-132 | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 730 Wp | 700 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.50 % | 22.53 % | | Power density | 235.0 Wp/m² | 225.3 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 50.16 V | 48.42 V | | Voltage at max power | 42.19 V | 40.39 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.19 A | 18.38 A | | Current at max power | 17.31 A | 17.35 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.290 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x30 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 34.0 kg | 37.7 kg | | Weight per kWp | 46.6 kg/kWp | 53.9 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 15 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | - | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | No | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, NS-730MH-132:** 24,493 kWh - **Cumulative output, PS700M13GFH-22/WNH:** 23,486 kWh - **Gap:** 1,007 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | NS-730MH-132 | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 730 W | 700 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 698 W | 670 W | 95.7% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 666 W | 639 W | 91.3% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 635 W | 609 W | 87.0% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | NS-730MH-132 | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #749 | #4,041 | 14,129 | NS-730MH-132 leads by 3,292 places | | Power density | #836 | #4,048 | 14,129 | NS-730MH-132 leads by 3,212 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,220 | #2,220 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #1,233 | #8,080 | 14,129 | NS-730MH-132 leads by 6,847 places | | Warranty | #9,912 | #21 | 14,129 | PS700M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 9,891 places | | Overall | #397 | #937 | 14,129 | NS-730MH-132 leads by 540 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 or Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH? According to our database: **Phono Solar NS-730MH-132** has higher module efficiency (**23.50%** vs **22.53%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 and Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH? **Phono Solar NS-730MH-132** has a module efficiency of **23.50%**, while **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** is **22.53%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 use vs Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH? **Phono Solar NS-730MH-132** uses **N-type** cells; **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 and Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH? **Phono Solar NS-730MH-132** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 and Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH bifacial panels? **Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Phono Solar NS-730MH-132** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-700MH-132](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132/phono-solar-ns-700mh-132) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-690MH-132](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132/phono-solar-ns-690mh-132) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-670MH-132](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132/phono-solar-ns-670mh-132) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-665MH-132](https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132/phono-solar-ns-665mh-132) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps700m13gfh-22-wnh Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.