--- title: "Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B vs Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B vs Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/mission-solar-msx10-445hn0b/solarever-se-182-105-450m-96-bd" updated: 2026-09-25 --- # Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B vs Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD MSX10-445HN0B leads on the differences that matter The largest is product warranty: 10 yrs longer. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msx10-445hn0b) | [Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-450m-96-bd) | | Manufacturer | Mission Solar | Solarever | | Power | 445 Wp | 450 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.80 % | 22.52 % | | Technology | N-type | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | MSX10-445HN0B | SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 15 yrs | +10 yrs for MSX10-445HN0B | | Open-circuit voltage | 39.69 V | 35.03 V | 4.66 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 14.02 A | 16.05 A | 2.03 A apart | | Module efficiency | 22.80 % | 22.52 % | +0.28 pp for MSX10-445HN0B | | Weight | 21.3 kg | 23.0 kg | -1.7 kg for MSX10-445HN0B | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | +0.010 %/°C for MSX10-445HN0B | | Cell technology | N-type | TOPCon | N-type vs TOPCon | | Weight per kWp | 47.9 kg/kWp | 51.1 kg/kWp | -3.2 kg/kWp for MSX10-445HN0B | | Module area | 1.953 m² | 1.998 m² | 0.045 m² apart | | Cell count | 108 | 96 | 12 cells apart | | Annual degradation | 0.45 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | -0.05 %/yr for SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD | | Voltage at max power | 33.44 V | 30.08 V | 3.36 V apart | | Current at max power | 13.31 A | 14.97 A | 1.66 A apart | | Bifacial | No | Yes | No vs Yes | | Dimensions | 1722x1134x35 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1722x1134x35 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | MSX10-445HN0B | SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 445 Wp | 450 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.80 % | 22.52 % | | Power density | 227.9 Wp/m² | 225.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 39.69 V | 35.03 V | | Voltage at max power | 33.44 V | 30.08 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.02 A | 16.05 A | | Current at max power | 13.31 A | 14.97 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.290 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1722x1134x35 mm | 1762x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 1.953 m² | 1.998 m² | | Weight | 21.3 kg | 23.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 47.9 kg/kWp | 51.1 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 15 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.45 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | N-type | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 96 | | Bifacial | No | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year - **Cumulative output, MSX10-445HN0B:** 14,814 kWh - **Cumulative output, SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD:** 15,098 kWh - **Gap:** 284 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | MSX10-445HN0B | SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 445 W | 450 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 426 W | 430 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 406 W | 410 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 387 W | 389 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | MSX10-445HN0B | SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #2,714 | #4,108 | 14,005 | MSX10-445HN0B leads by 1,394 places | | Power density | #2,790 | #4,225 | 14,005 | MSX10-445HN0B leads by 1,435 places | | Heat behaviour | #2,165 | #6,093 | 14,005 | MSX10-445HN0B leads by 3,928 places | | Weight | #1,948 | #4,436 | 14,005 | MSX10-445HN0B leads by 2,488 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #5,891 | #8,408 | 14,005 | MSX10-445HN0B leads by 2,517 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B or Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD? According to our database: **Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B** has higher module efficiency (**22.80%** vs **22.52%**); **Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B** tolerates heat better (temp coeff **-0.290%/°C** vs **-0.300%/°C**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B and Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD? **Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B** has a module efficiency of **22.80%**, while **Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD** is **22.52%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B use vs Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD? **Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B** uses **N-type** cells; **Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B and Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD? **Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B and Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD bifacial panels? **Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD** is bifacial (captures light from both faces); **Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B** is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath. ## Related comparisons - [Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B vs Mission Solar MSX10-440HN0B](https://comparepv.com/compare/mission-solar-msx10-445hn0b/mission-solar-msx10-440hn0b) - One difference: module efficiency - [Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B vs Mission Solar MSX10-435HN0B](https://comparepv.com/compare/mission-solar-msx10-445hn0b/mission-solar-msx10-435hn0b) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-470M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-450m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-470m-96-bd) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-450m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-460M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-450m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-460m-96-bd) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Solarever SE-182\*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182\*105-455M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/compare/solarever-se-182-105-450m-96-bd/solarever-se-182-105-455m-96-bd) - One difference: module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/mission-solar-msx10-445hn0b/solarever-se-182-105-450m-96-bd Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.