--- title: "Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/luxor-solar-lx-435-m-182-108-gg/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/luxor-solar-lx-435-m-182-108-gg/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG LX-715M/210-132+ GG leads on the differences that matter The largest is rated power: 280 W more power. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-435-m-182-108-gg) | [Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1) | | Manufacturer | Luxor Solar | Luxor Solar | | Power | 435 Wp | 715 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.61 % | 23.23 % | | Technology | HJT | HJT | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG | LX-715M/210-132+ GG | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 435 Wp | 715 Wp | +280 W for LX-715M/210-132+ GG | | Module efficiency | 22.61 % | 23.23 % | +0.62 pp for LX-715M/210-132+ GG | | Weight | 24.0 kg | 38.7 kg | -14.7 kg for LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG | | Power density | 222.8 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | +7.4 Wp/m² for LX-715M/210-132+ GG | | Open-circuit voltage | 42.32 V | 51.19 V | 8.87 V apart | | Short-circuit current | 13.43 A | 17.49 A | 4.06 A apart | | Module area | 1.953 m² | 3.106 m² | 1.154 m² apart | | Voltage at max power | 34.49 V | 43.51 V | 9.02 V apart | | Current at max power | 12.62 A | 16.44 A | 3.82 A apart | | Cell count | 108 | 132 | 24 cells apart | | Dimensions | 1722x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG | LX-715M/210-132+ GG | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 435 Wp | 715 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.61 % | 23.23 % | | Power density | 222.8 Wp/m² | 230.2 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 42.32 V | 51.19 V | | Voltage at max power | 34.49 V | 43.51 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.43 A | 17.49 A | | Current at max power | 12.62 A | 16.44 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.240 %/°C | -0.240 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1722x1134x30 mm | 2384x1303x35 mm | | Module area | 1.953 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 24.0 kg | 38.7 kg | | Weight per kWp | 55.2 kg/kWp | 54.1 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | - | 0.21 %/yr | | Cell technology | HJT | HJT | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 108 | 132 | | Bifacial | Yes | Yes | ## Thirty-year yield A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG:** 14,595 kWh - **Cumulative output, LX-715M/210-132+ GG:** 23,990 kWh - **Gap:** 9,395 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG | LX-715M/210-132+ GG | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 435 W | 715 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 419 W | 689 W | 96.4% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 404 W | 664 W | 92.8% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 388 W | 638 W | 89.2% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG | LX-715M/210-132+ GG | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #3,701 | #1,295 | 14,129 | LX-715M/210-132+ GG leads by 2,406 places | | Power density | #5,212 | #2,070 | 14,129 | LX-715M/210-132+ GG leads by 3,142 places | | Heat behaviour | #13 | #13 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #9,671 | #8,418 | 14,129 | LX-715M/210-132+ GG leads by 1,253 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #5,646 | #31 | 14,129 | LX-715M/210-132+ GG leads by 5,615 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG or Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG? According to our database: **Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG** has higher module efficiency (**23.23%** vs **22.61%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG and Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG? **Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG** has a module efficiency of **22.61%**, while **Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG** is **23.23%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG use vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG? **Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG** uses **HJT** cells; **Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG** uses **HJT**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG and Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG? **Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ### Are Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG and Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG bifacial panels? Both **Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG** and **Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG** are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5**-15%** more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath. ## Related comparisons - [Luxor Solar LX - 435 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 440 M/182-108+ GG](https://comparepv.com/compare/luxor-solar-lx-435-m-182-108-gg/luxor-solar-lx-440-m-182-108-gg) - One difference: module efficiency - [Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/compare/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg) - The same specification on paper - [Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/compare/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg-1) - The same specification on paper - [Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/compare/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg) - The same specification on paper - [Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/compare/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg) - The same specification on paper - [Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/compare/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg-1) - The same specification on paper --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/luxor-solar-lx-435-m-182-108-gg/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.