---
title: "Lexron 410W vs Lexron 415W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Lexron 410W vs Lexron 415W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/lexron-410w/lexron-415w"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Lexron 410W vs Lexron 415W

415W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.25 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Lexron 410W](https://comparepv.com/panel/lexron-410w) | [Lexron 415W](https://comparepv.com/panel/lexron-415w) |
| Manufacturer | Lexron | Lexron |
| Power | 410 Wp | 415 Wp |
| Efficiency | 20.61 % | 20.86 % |
| Technology | PERC | PERC |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 410W | 415W | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 20.61 % | 20.86 % | +0.25 pp for 415W |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 410W | 415W |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 410 Wp | 415 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 20.61 % | 20.86 % |
| Power density | 206.1 Wp/m² | 208.6 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 49.82 V | 50.00 V |
| Voltage at max power | 41.52 V | 41.67 V |
| Short-circuit current | 10.42 A | 10.51 A |
| Current at max power | 9.87 A | 9.96 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.350 %/°C | -0.350 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1987x1001x35 mm | 1987x1001x35 mm |
| Module area | 1.989 m² | 1.989 m² |
| Weight | 22.0 kg | 22.0 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 53.7 kg/kWp | 53.0 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.45 %/yr | 0.45 %/yr |
| Cell technology | PERC | PERC |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 72 | 72 |
| Bifacial | No | No |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 410W:** 13,502 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 415W:** 13,666 kWh
- **Gap:** 164 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 410W | 415W | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 410 W | 415 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 388 W | 393 W | 94.8% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 367 W | 371 W | 89.5% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 345 W | 350 W | 84.2% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 410W | 415W | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #11,082 | #10,348 | 14,005 | 415W leads by 734 places |
| Power density | #11,095 | #10,303 | 14,005 | 415W leads by 792 places |
| Heat behaviour | #10,419 | #10,419 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #7,662 | #6,767 | 14,005 | 415W leads by 895 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #11,373 | #11,092 | 14,005 | 415W leads by 281 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Lexron 410W or Lexron 415W?

According to our database: **Lexron **415 W**** has higher module efficiency (**20.86%** vs **20.61%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Lexron 410W and Lexron 415W?

**Lexron **410 W**** has a module efficiency of **20.61%**, while **Lexron **415 W**** is **20.86%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Lexron 410W use vs Lexron 415W?

**Lexron **410 W**** uses **PERC** cells; **Lexron **415 W**** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Lexron 410W and Lexron 415W?

**Lexron **410 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Lexron **415 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


## Related comparisons

- [Lexron 410W vs Lexron 430W](https://comparepv.com/compare/lexron-410w/lexron-430w) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Lexron 410W vs Lexron 425W](https://comparepv.com/compare/lexron-410w/lexron-425w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Lexron 410W vs Lexron 420W](https://comparepv.com/compare/lexron-410w/lexron-420w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Lexron 410W vs Lexron 405W](https://comparepv.com/compare/lexron-410w/lexron-405w) - One difference: module efficiency
- [Lexron 410W vs Lexron LEXRON 600W](https://comparepv.com/compare/lexron-410w/lexron-lexron-600w) - 14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Lexron 410W vs Lexron LEXRON 595W](https://comparepv.com/compare/lexron-410w/lexron-lexron-595w) - 14 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/lexron-410w/lexron-415w

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

