--- title: "Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W Identical on every published parameter All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w) | [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w) | | Manufacturer | Leapton | Leapton | | Power | 715 Wp | 720 Wp | | Efficiency | 23.12 % | 23.18 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 715W | 720W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 715 Wp | 720 Wp | | Module efficiency | 23.12 % | 23.18 % | | Power density | 230.2 Wp/m² | 231.8 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.80 V | 49.00 V | | Voltage at max power | 40.80 V | 41.00 V | | Short-circuit current | 18.61 A | 18.65 A | | Current at max power | 17.52 A | 17.56 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2384x1303x33 mm | 2384x1303x33 mm | | Module area | 3.106 m² | 3.106 m² | | Weight | 34.0 kg | 34.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 47.6 kg/kWp | 47.2 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 132 | 132 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 715W:** 23,990 kWh - **Cumulative output, 720W:** 24,157 kWh - **Gap:** 167 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 715W | 720W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 715 W | 720 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 683 W | 688 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 651 W | 655 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 618 W | 623 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 715W | 720W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #1,567 | #1,424 | 14,005 | 720W leads by 143 places | | Power density | #2,018 | #1,347 | 14,005 | 720W leads by 671 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #1,753 | #1,588 | 14,005 | 720W leads by 165 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #92 | #75 | 14,005 | 720W leads by 17 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W or Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W? According to our database: **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**720 W**** has higher module efficiency (**23.18%** vs **23.12%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W? **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**715 W**** has a module efficiency of **23.12%**, while **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**720 W**** is **23.18%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W use vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W? **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**715 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**720 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W? **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**715 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-**720 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-710W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-710w) - One difference: module efficiency - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-705W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-705w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-700W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-700w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-695W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-695w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-690W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-690w) - 5 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210\*210-M-66-NB-720W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-720w) - 3 differences, the largest is weight --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.