--- title: "Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-475W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-475W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-495w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-495W 495W leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.39 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w) | [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-495W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-495w) | | Manufacturer | Leapton | Leapton | | Power | 475 Wp | 495 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.94 % | 22.33 % | | Technology | TOPCon | N-type | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 475W | 495W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 21.94 % | 22.33 % | +0.39 pp for 495W | | Rated power | 475 Wp | 495 Wp | +20 W for 495W | | Module area | 2.165 m² | 2.217 m² | 0.052 m² apart | | Power density | 219.4 Wp/m² | 223.3 Wp/m² | +3.9 Wp/m² for 495W | | Cell technology | TOPCon | N-type | TOPCon vs N-type | | Open-circuit voltage | 42.75 V | 43.82 V | 1.07 V apart | | Dimensions | 1909x1134x30 mm | 1955x1134x30 mm | 1909x1134x30 mm vs 1955x1134x30 mm | | Voltage at max power | 35.19 V | 36.35 V | 1.16 V apart | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 475W | 495W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 475 Wp | 495 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.94 % | 22.33 % | | Power density | 219.4 Wp/m² | 223.3 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 42.75 V | 43.82 V | | Voltage at max power | 35.19 V | 36.35 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.04 A | 14.09 A | | Current at max power | 13.50 A | 13.62 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1909x1134x30 mm | 1955x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 2.165 m² | 2.217 m² | | Weight | 23.0 kg | 23.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 48.4 kg/kWp | 47.5 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | N-type | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 120 | 120 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 475W:** 15,937 kWh - **Cumulative output, 495W:** 16,608 kWh - **Gap:** 671 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 475W | 495W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 475 W | 495 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 454 W | 473 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 432 W | 450 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 411 W | 428 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 475W | 495W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #6,751 | #5,054 | 14,005 | 495W leads by 1,697 places | | Power density | #6,709 | #5,043 | 14,005 | 495W leads by 1,666 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #2,263 | #1,708 | 14,005 | 495W leads by 555 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #5,874 | #4,798 | 14,005 | 495W leads by 1,076 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W or Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-495W? According to our database: **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**495 W**** has higher module efficiency (**22.33%** vs **21.94%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W and Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-495W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**475 W**** has a module efficiency of **21.94%**, while **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**495 W**** is **22.33%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W use vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-495W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**475 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**495 W**** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W and Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-495W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**475 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**495 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-500W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-500w) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-490W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-490w) - 5 differences, the largest is rated power - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-485W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-485w) - 4 differences, the largest is module area - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-480W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-480w) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-470W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-470w) - One difference: module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-495w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.