---
title: "Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-490W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-490W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-490w"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-490W

490W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.62 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w) | [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-490W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-490w) |
| Manufacturer | Leapton | Leapton |
| Power | 465 Wp | 490 Wp |
| Efficiency | 21.48 % | 22.10 % |
| Technology | TOPCon | N-type |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 465W | 490W | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 21.48 % | 22.10 % | +0.62 pp for 490W |
| Rated power | 465 Wp | 490 Wp | +25 W for 490W |
| Power density | 214.8 Wp/m² | 221.0 Wp/m² | +6.2 Wp/m² for 490W |
| Module area | 2.165 m² | 2.217 m² | 0.052 m² apart |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | N-type | TOPCon vs N-type |
| Open-circuit voltage | 42.45 V | 43.67 V | 1.22 V apart |
| Dimensions | 1909x1134x30 mm | 1955x1134x30 mm | 1909x1134x30 mm vs 1955x1134x30 mm |
| Voltage at max power | 34.89 V | 36.19 V | 1.30 V apart |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 465W | 490W |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 465 Wp | 490 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 21.48 % | 22.10 % |
| Power density | 214.8 Wp/m² | 221.0 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 42.45 V | 43.67 V |
| Voltage at max power | 34.89 V | 36.19 V |
| Short-circuit current | 13.90 A | 14.00 A |
| Current at max power | 13.33 A | 13.54 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1909x1134x30 mm | 1955x1134x30 mm |
| Module area | 2.165 m² | 2.217 m² |
| Weight | 23.0 kg | 23.5 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 49.5 kg/kWp | 48.0 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr |
| Cell technology | TOPCon | N-type |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 120 | 120 |
| Bifacial | No | No |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 465W:** 15,602 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 490W:** 16,440 kWh
- **Gap:** 838 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 465W | 490W | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 465 W | 490 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 444 W | 468 W | 95.5% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 423 W | 446 W | 91.0% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 402 W | 424 W | 86.5% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 465W | 490W | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #8,152 | #6,012 | 14,005 | 490W leads by 2,140 places |
| Power density | #8,116 | #5,998 | 14,005 | 490W leads by 2,118 places |
| Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #2,991 | #1,984 | 14,005 | 490W leads by 1,007 places |
| Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #6,851 | #5,204 | 14,005 | 490W leads by 1,647 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W or Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-490W?

According to our database: **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**490 W**** has higher module efficiency (**22.10%** vs **21.48%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W and Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-490W?

**Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**465 W**** has a module efficiency of **21.48%**, while **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**490 W**** is **22.10%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W use vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-490W?

**Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**465 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**490 W**** uses **N-type**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W and Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-490W?

**Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**465 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**490 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


## Related comparisons

- [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-500W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-500w) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-495W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-495w) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-485W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-485w) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-480W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-480w) - 5 differences, the largest is rated power
- [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-470W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-470w) - One difference: module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-490w

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

