--- title: "Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-475W - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-475W side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W 475W leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.46 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w) | [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w) | | Manufacturer | Leapton | Leapton | | Power | 465 Wp | 475 Wp | | Efficiency | 21.48 % | 21.94 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 465W | 475W | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 21.48 % | 21.94 % | +0.46 pp for 475W | | Power density | 214.8 Wp/m² | 219.4 Wp/m² | +4.6 Wp/m² for 475W | | Rated power | 465 Wp | 475 Wp | +10 W for 475W | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 465W | 475W | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 465 Wp | 475 Wp | | Module efficiency | 21.48 % | 21.94 % | | Power density | 214.8 Wp/m² | 219.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 42.45 V | 42.75 V | | Voltage at max power | 34.89 V | 35.19 V | | Short-circuit current | 13.90 A | 14.04 A | | Current at max power | 13.33 A | 13.50 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1909x1134x30 mm | 1909x1134x30 mm | | Module area | 2.165 m² | 2.165 m² | | Weight | 23.0 kg | 23.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 49.5 kg/kWp | 48.4 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.40 %/yr | 0.40 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 120 | 120 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 465W:** 15,602 kWh - **Cumulative output, 475W:** 15,937 kWh - **Gap:** 335 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 465W | 475W | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 465 W | 475 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 444 W | 454 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 423 W | 432 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 402 W | 411 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 465W | 475W | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #8,152 | #6,751 | 14,005 | 475W leads by 1,401 places | | Power density | #8,116 | #6,709 | 14,005 | 475W leads by 1,407 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #2,991 | #2,263 | 14,005 | 475W leads by 728 places | | Warranty | #21 | #21 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #6,851 | #5,874 | 14,005 | 475W leads by 977 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W or Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W? According to our database: **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**475 W**** has higher module efficiency (**21.94%** vs **21.48%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W and Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**465 W**** has a module efficiency of **21.48%**, while **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**475 W**** is **21.94%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W use vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**465 W**** uses **TOPCon** cells; **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**475 W**** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W and Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-475W? **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**465 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty; **Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-**475 W**** has a **30 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-500W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-500w) - 9 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-495W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-495w) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-490W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-490w) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-485W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-485w) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-480W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-480w) - 5 differences, the largest is rated power - [Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-465W vs Leapton LP182\*182-M-60-NH-470W](https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-470w) - One difference: module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-465w/leapton-lp182-182-m-60-nh-475w Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.